Re: [OPSEC] New Rev of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02.txt

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Wed, 05 September 2012 07:41 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDE121F84C8 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pdXeVfIJGf-j for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72EF521F852E for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 00:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 85-7-200.lacnic.net.uy (unknown [200.7.85.90]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C23B308424; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 04:41:34 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B24077F08@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:41:28 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D825D5F7-28D3-4CD0-A6EF-5FCCF45E0899@lacnic.net>
References: <20120821111757.8846.20372.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50336EBA.1080105@gont.com.ar> <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B24077F08@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
To: Gunter Van de Velde <gvandeve@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "'opsec@ietf.org'" <opsec@ietf.org>, opsec chairs <opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] New Rev of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02.txt
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:41:46 -0000

	I have read and I support it for WG adoption.

Regards,
as

On 21 Aug 2012, at 12:27, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:

> With this note the OPSEC chairs would like to probe for WG adoption.
> 
> During the cause of events and discussion on the WG mailing list, this document has been seen as valuable for the WG to adopt as work item.
> 
> 2 questions need to be addressed:
> 
> 1. Please find 2 weeks to provide feedback on this draft. Please say yes/no on WG adoption. 
> 2. Should this be BCP or Informational track
> 
> G/
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fernando Gont
> Sent: 21 August 2012 13:19
> To: 'opsec@ietf.org'
> Cc: opsec chairs
> Subject: [OPSEC] New Rev of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02.txt
> 
> Folks,
> 
> FYI, I have posted a new rev of the aforementioned I-D, which is meant to address the feedback I have received so far.
> 
> This version should be ready for the formal wg call for adoption-.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Best regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02.txt
> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:17:57 -0700
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: fernando@gont.com.ar
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Fernando Gont and posted to the IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
> Revision:	 02
> Title:		 Security Implications of IPv6 on IPv4 Networks
> Creation date:	 2012-08-21
> WG ID:		 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 18
> URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02.txt
> Status:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
> Htmlized:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02
> Diff:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02
> 
> Abstract:
>  This document discusses the security implications of native IPv6
>  support and IPv6 transition/co-existence technologies on "IPv4-only"
>  networks, and describes possible mitigations for the aforementioned
>  issues.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec