[OPSEC] Fwd: attacks on keyed-hash constructions
RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com> Mon, 05 January 2009 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928523A6A12; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6353A66B4 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:53:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mgkpw9-JOjw for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A1C3A692A for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.20.71] ([70.104.193.39]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KD0001B1KJBO3Z3@vms042.mailsrvcs.net> for opsec@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:52:28 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:52:23 -0500
From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>
To: opsec@ietf.org
Message-id: <C02E353E-5FDB-4AEB-985E-F49AB4FE1B39@extremenetworks.com>
MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
References: <5F8E31B0-CD96-4ED1-83FD-883F0AD78657@cisco.com>
Subject: [OPSEC] Fwd: attacks on keyed-hash constructions
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
OPsec Folks,
David McGrew just posted a helpful note, with references,
to several other IETF/IRTF lists, partly in response to
a query I had made.
Here is a URL to his note:
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/current/msg02428.html>
In the meantime, I have found a couple of papers that might be
relevant (likely some overlap with the ones that he cited in
his note above). I'll try to post references and a short
summary of what they seem to say after I get a chance to read them.
So I think we're making some headway over time towards having
scientific data for the WG to evaluate.
Cheers,
Ran
rja@extremenetworks.com
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] Fwd: attacks on keyed-hash constructions RJ Atkinson
- Re: [OPSEC] attacks on keyed-hash constructions David McGrew