Re: [OPSEC] draft-jdurand-bgp-security comment
Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Thu, 02 August 2012 08:01 UTC
Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D2F21F8E00 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 01:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9gOVEAN6d9y for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 01:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B09E21F8E01 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 01:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24949F8D07 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:01:38 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07314F8D03 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:01:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 1014 invoked by uid 1007); 2 Aug 2012 10:01:37 +0200
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:01:37 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
Message-ID: <20120802080137.GM38127@Space.Net>
References: <5D3BC3C2-9E2D-464C-8F6A-A712F3F49157@viagenie.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5D3BC3C2-9E2D-464C-8F6A-A712F3F49157@viagenie.ca>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] draft-jdurand-bgp-security comment
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 08:01:41 -0000
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 02:41:32PM -0700, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> <extract of draft>
> 4.1.1.2. IPv6
>
> There is no equivalent of RFC5735 for IPv6. This document recalls
> the prefixes that MUST not cross network boundaries and therefore
> MUST be filtered:
> </extract of draft>
>
> There is an equivalent of RFC5735 for IPv6. it is RFC5156 and touches the same content in that section.
Thanks for pointing that out. We'll integrate the reference and adapt
the text accordingly.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- [OPSEC] draft-jdurand-bgp-security comment Marc Blanchet
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-jdurand-bgp-security comment Marc Blanchet
- Re: [OPSEC] draft-jdurand-bgp-security comment Gert Doering