Re: [OPSEC] The plan...
Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com> Sun, 22 November 2009 01:43 UTC
Return-Path: <glen.kent@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328563A686B for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:43:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.359
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_LWSHORTT=1.24]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OMsptzRrHB8N for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:43:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yx0-f192.google.com (mail-yx0-f192.google.com [209.85.210.192]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F593A68C6 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:43:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yxe30 with SMTP id 30so4866861yxe.29 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:43:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0oqetO0ZQPaDNADIf4IjKs26eF5JdbXyAd1dKBumbv8=; b=s7SdW4gci3qvqiZQG74CztDpgCQak+xgmm6W2UpFw50RA/pOONIEl1T9Q2lPER5cvj W9oCSR3MwIKNAHg9xpoOx10rSY0Yfi+7RFchbiT0bLXtH0wNiI9kpv+JPjMoe3lOxtT3 umCdFQO+XBmvac25lzEfUzUCbLvV1mlUkSfw8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=P9SPmVqmQm0vVga8+rJdEsH7SKl8R4ejoza15pHHw13fwaAyBeydyll+6SbXEhLLQ/ W9kldmNocds6NZEJ2oVBAM7QbImhV/reEQW7ZraCEsR2yUybgRkAvpIEDRMgH55jd8S3 zK8S5P3BXM8y7OZq9M97+3T4plEBIfHN4Ynmc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.167.30 with SMTP id u30mr3162815ano.147.1258854229422; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:43:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B08768A.1070903@bogus.com>
References: <4B08768A.1070903@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:13:49 +0530
Message-ID: <92c950310911211743u4ba19447u340a1e71c2f7a981@mail.gmail.com>
From: Glen Kent <glen.kent@gmail.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] The plan...
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:43:56 -0000
> Minutes will be published shortly. That'll be nice. > > planned short term events are: > > draft-ietf-opsec-ip-security - wglc > > draft-ietf-opsec-routing-protocols-crypto-issues-02 - wglc I think these two documents are ready for the WGLC. > > > draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-04 - test for inclusion as a > wg document > > Docuement can be reviewed here: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhatia-manral-igp-crypto-requirements-04 > I firmly believe that we need such a document and fully support this. Glen
- [OPSEC] The plan... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [OPSEC] The plan... Glen Kent