IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements

Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com> Thu, 05 April 2018 11:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FB612D87F; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 04:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id on50fa4d2YTT; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 04:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x233.google.com (mail-wr0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237E412D7ED; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 04:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x233.google.com with SMTP id d17so12340181wre.1; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 04:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bI5d5m4ZcbqAaOlzPRJgLkHi4AVhZkrrzAyktac5vh8=; b=M1b+2/ql3vPcUVYZJ4QV1KajwPhCDWoVV2BfNxfplAfUeqxyCpFK3J3eRy27dj+ssT UdVoBUS5nWaL/LCeHqw8pImUS+W4OzFmi9hHGnQPnmatpt9keKItFZ2b4rD46EyImufV tBGgQlHcYe8RcJgnA49iqeXudTIdNBa46b/G1avJKpiTTs9VlhiRGaxAcWQpEAcduffa PxqL8nO9yS3KPNCrTS15NL3rUxczWAPsO5X04dZKXKNQGG7bGMFCjb9rdKYdb5x/73LK 72ggxqFntzOvDqhgO4iaTFm3LfRIVcEbzGMy5HtGr3P8zM4oQBsdLtvhuFqbPtWdq/VM 0igA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bI5d5m4ZcbqAaOlzPRJgLkHi4AVhZkrrzAyktac5vh8=; b=ebtdk2qHf0zCNDeo22OGwLXx5Rj7gHJlcVdGdRTx6PNqXLkzoHjq3BekqriPh3rE/U /a7/AZxTnBRDiQLTIhKCjpYWxF1JQc9v3NCXNxHaVUph8NpPAQsC4I+FM2vVmneWHARp IMjkuQ23L8TEcVU5RGp+Kbo4ILlB7cJYh8tSQIb3LeZUW6ekn2q3mofF61AvaRIsNLEa ylx7HGl9jZ5AZxKcNBKsLyDd9sCC0xrUeRZokCsD3wIqo9VmOxnR9aZnZbIcMgneONEf 2mGUE/Kb2Ust7bB/SF1hhY230W1TsihlRe0xWu2twMciAhCBrY+Xn7tnFwKRlr7fiYs4 PDNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7G+k8m/D8/1l9S9HCD0rfIAJn8i+/6cG9v5dt5uT0kV6ORQPwMW zgyLZhm2gziv1sIz++M8uPVHq9ZuKQ2Q+uQWFIc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/xTNfU3QZ1OJ8WB4eoC/9H7O3yohSJjfvwI9tL24WumKn+9nmqAtNPv5RoH3vraLqd8iL84jYMeVqPaYF6Tko=
X-Received: by 10.223.139.206 with SMTP id w14mr16511686wra.169.1522926689223; Thu, 05 Apr 2018 04:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.140.75 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2018 04:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DDAC669A-62E0-4D71-B380-105782B06331@cisco.com>
References: <DDAC669A-62E0-4D71-B380-105782B06331@cisco.com>
From: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 13:11:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA7e52oHnB5sZJ4nf3V0jMYA61geGj5r6ycEnECSkb4xNYgVRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org" <draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements@ietf.org>, aa@qrator.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e9f52548a2a0569180038"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/jbHXI4lmuTDOQ_kYUEwX508LHQY>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 11:11:36 -0000

Hi,

FYI, as mentioned during opsec WG session, there was a presentation, during
grow WG session, about an alternative solution:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-grow-urpf-reboot-00

Best regards,

JMC.


2018-04-04 21:15 GMT+02:00 Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke@cisco.com>:

> As discussed during the WG meeting in London IETF-101, let's have a call
> for adopting draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements as an OPSEC Working
> Group document.
>
>
>
> The call will last 2 weeks until 18th of April included (UTC midnight).
>
>
>
> So, please reply to the list whether you support the adoption or not.
> Obviously, if adopted, then the document will probably be reviewed more
> extensively and modified.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your participation
>
>
>
> -éric & -ron
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email