[OPSEC] draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf
Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info> Wed, 10 September 2008 15:58 UTC
Return-Path: <opsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsec-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FB93A6925; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF603A6863 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.842, BAYES_05=-1.11, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZwqCN5w39Ev for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from monster.hopcount.ca (monster.hopcount.ca [199.212.90.4]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7630028C265 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=monster; d=ca.afilias.info; h=Received:Message-Id:From:To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:Subject:Mime-Version:Date:Cc:X-Mailer; b=CUjYvYOUdQsDaRNo3OzXEM6n6ynyuruYPZEGtyoXHAFfg1g74pO1irj58Abp5afv6+AyuRimV/eeNlY3tDWUNN2VFW6UbaV6VAnufkJ4fKoru6N5YVSAV3GjN/FKLdjm;
Received: from [199.212.90.13] (helo=calamari.hopcount.ca) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@ca.afilias.info>) id 1KdS4N-000Ov3-CM; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:57:27 +0000
Message-Id: <59B403A0-9BDD-47E6-9E03-EA129F6EADF3@ca.afilias.info>
From: Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>
To: opsec@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v928.1)
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:57:24 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.928.1)
Subject: [OPSEC] draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: opsec@ietf.org
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsec-bounces@ietf.org
Colleagues, Joel and I have been asked to consider the following draft for an opsec working group document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf/ We would like to hear comments from the working group specifically on whether that draft might be adopted as a work item (not on the detailed content of the draft; feedback like that would come later, if we adopted it). Such comments would ideally be sent to the list. Many thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- [OPSEC] draft-kumari-blackhole-urpf Joe Abley