applying the model
Jeff Yarnell <jeffya@teleport.com> Thu, 11 May 1995 22:10 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11476; 11 May 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from [132.151.1.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11472; 11 May 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from wugate.wustl.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa18214; 11 May 95 18:10 EDT
Received: from host (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id RAA08218; Thu, 11 May 1995 17:10:25 -0500
Received: from desiree.teleport.com (desiree.teleport.com [192.108.254.11]) by wugate.wustl.edu (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA08090 for <oswg-l@mail.wustl.edu>; Thu, 11 May 1995 17:07:43 -0500
Received: from yarnell (ip-pdx6-12.teleport.com [204.119.60.172]) by desiree.teleport.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA11596; Thu, 11 May 1995 15:07:39 -0700
Message-Id: <199505112207.PAA11596@desiree.teleport.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 1995 15:08:46 -0700
Reply-To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
X-Orig-Sender: owner-oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Jeff Yarnell <jeffya@teleport.com>
To: oswg-l@wugate.wustl.edu
Subject: applying the model
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Sender: jeffya@mail.teleport.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
X-Listprocessor-Version: 7.1 -- ListProcessor by CREN
After posting some questions to the list a few weeks ago, I have been trying to apply the opstat model to standard MIBs other than MIB-II. The responses to my questions confirmed that the model is biased towards polling routers for MIB-II statistics. Please don't misunderstand my comments. I think the work that has been so far is great. I'm just trying to apply it and, perhaps, stretch it a little. I'd like to see the opstat work continue and become more robust. I have been considering how the model and specifically the storage format may be applied to the RMON MIB. I have found some difficulties and am interested in other's opinions as how the problems may be solved. Problem: The opstat model's means of identifying variables polled is to put them in the tag-table. According to RFC1404, "Variable names are the fully qualified Internet MIB names." The examples given show things like, "ifInOctets." This works well when the variable being polled is either a scalar, or has a one-to-one correspondence with the number of interfaces on the polled device (e.g. "ifInOctets"). However, this doesn't work for some tables. Consider the RMON host table. The table has entries for each physical address seen by the probe and is indexed by the physical address. I don't see how the current storage format could accommodate polling objects in such a table. If the device section's tag table includes "hostInPkts" which host is it? How does the server indicate that it's polling hostInPkts for all hosts in the table? It seems to me that either the device section must be modified such that variable-names include the instance portion of the variable polled or the data section must have instance identification associated with each data-value Interested in your thoughts, Jeff Yarnell Kaspia Systems, Inc. 503-620-5571
- applying the model Jeff Yarnell