Re: Internet X.500 Schema

Srinivas R Sataluri <sri@qsun.ho.att.com> Wed, 09 November 1994 13:50 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01717; 9 Nov 94 8:50 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01713; 9 Nov 94 8:50 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05287; 9 Nov 94 8:50 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.00250-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Nov 1994 12:23:36 +0000
Received: from gw1.att.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.15674-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Nov 1994 12:23:25 +0000
Received: from qsun.ho.att.com by ig1.att.att.com id AA22895; Tue, 8 Nov 94 23:19:19 EST
Received: by qsun.ho.att.com (4.1/EMS-1.1.1 SunOS) id AA15163; Tue, 8 Nov 94 23:20:42 EST
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 1994 23:20:42 -0500
Message-Id: <9411090420.AA15163@qsun.ho.att.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Srinivas R Sataluri <sri@qsun.ho.att.com>
To: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
Cc: managers@nameflow.dante.net, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wg-nap@rare.nl, wpp-camayocs@psi.com
Subject: Re: Internet X.500 Schema

Steve:
   > From research!rare.nl!wg-nap-request Tue Oct 25 15:53:42 1994
   > To: sri@ds.internic.net
   > Cc: managers@nameflow.dante.net, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, wg-nap@rare.nl,
   >         wpp-camayocs@psi.com
   > Subject: Re: Internet X.500 Schema
   > From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
   > Sender: wg-nap-request@rare.nl
   > 
   > Sri,
   > 
   > This sounds like excellent work, and is a good demonstration of
   > distributed electronic publishing.   Are you also intending to
   > publish this as an RFC?   I think that this has quite a few advantages:
   > 
   > 1) Gives a clear successtion to RFC 1274
   > 
   > 2) Useful for the luddites amongst us
   > 
   > 3) Important and comprehensible to those outside the Internet community
   > 
   > regards
   > 
   > Steve

Steve:

Thanks. The original internet-draft on this subject is about to be
published as an informational RFC. We are expecting help from the
community for cleaning up the schema and retiring useless and duplicate
elements. We will then proceed to publish "production" schema elements
as RFCs.

We will discuss this issue in the IDS working group meeting at San Jose
and hope to make substantial progress after San Jose.

Best regards,

-sri [Srinivas Sataluri]
AT&T Bell Laboratories/InterNIC Directory and Database Services
(908) 949-7782; sri@qsun.att.com (or) sri@internic.net