Re: Charter for Chandi.
Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com> Wed, 09 February 1994 09:01 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01386; 9 Feb 94 4:01 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01382; 9 Feb 94 4:01 EST
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02965; 9 Feb 94 4:01 EST
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.01159-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Feb 1994 08:35:02 +0000
Received: from glengoyne.isode.com by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.19907-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 9 Feb 1994 08:34:50 +0000
To: "Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)" <Erik.Huizer@surfnet.nl>
cc: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Charter for Chandi.
Phone: +44-81-332-9091
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 02 Feb 1994 10:11:56 +0100. <"survis.sur.638:02.01.94.09.12.12"@surfnet.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1581.760782935.1@glengoyne.isode.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 1994 08:35:37 +0000
Message-ID: <1582.760782937@glengoyne.isode.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
"Currently the thinking in the IETF/IESG/IAB is certainly that...." This whole attitude is grossly patronising. It reminds me of SC 21 diktat to the X.500 standardisation group. The IETF will live or die by its quality engineering and grass roots. Lets discuss what is good for solving the problem in hand, and engineering issues. Steve
- Charter for Chandi. Glenn Mansfield
- Re: Charter for Chandi. Erik Huizer (SURFnet BV)
- Re: Charter for Chandi. Glenn Mansfield
- Re: Charter for Chandi. Steve Kille