Re: rfc 1384

Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager@gate.switch.ch> Thu, 07 July 1994 06:59 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23947; 7 Jul 94 2:59 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23943; 7 Jul 94 2:59 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00271; 7 Jul 94 2:59 EDT
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 7 Jul 1994 07:18:47 +0100
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 1994 07:18:47 +0100
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.963:07.06.94.06.18.47]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Thu, 7 Jul 1994 07:18:46 +0100;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager@gate.switch.ch>
Message-ID: <13274*/S=lenggenhager/OU=gate/O=switch/PRMD=switch/ADMD=arcom/C=ch/@MHS>
To: Jason Cross <jcross01@eng.eds.com>
Cc: osi-ds <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <199407062048.AA21850@gmlink.gmeds.com>
Subject: Re: rfc 1384

Jason Cross wrote:
> I just read the doco called "Naming and Structuring Guidelines
> for X.500 Directory Pilots".  The Abstract states this doco will
> replace rfc 1384.  Does this mean that rfc 1384 will be obsolete
> and a new rfc number assigned to this doco, or will this doco
> have rfc 1384 stamped on it?

RFCs get always new numbers when they are changed. RFC1617 replaces RFC1384.

> Is it standard practice to have leaf objects (people and devices)
> under the same non-leaf object, or is it more sensible to create
> a non-leaf object to separate people and devices.  To better
> explain here's an example:
> 
>          ...
>           |
>         ou=sales
>           |
>       --------------
>       |            |
>     cn=John Smith  cn= Unix Server 1
> 
> 
> OR
> 
>          ...
>           |
>         ou=sales
>           |
>       --------------
>       |            |
>     xx=??        yy=??
>       |            |
>     cn=John Smith  cn=Unix Server 1
> 
> 
> If the second is acceptable then what object class would I
> use for the non-leaf objects xx and yy?

In case there are not just a few entries for persons and machines I would
seperate them into different ou branches, e.g.:
	ou=staff
and
	ou=servers

Thomas

===============================================================================
               SWITCH - The Swiss Academic and Research Network
   Thomas Lenggenhager, SWITCH, Limmatquai 138, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
   INET: lenggenhager@switch.ch | Tel: +41 1 268 1540 | Fax: +41 1 268 1568
      X.400: G=thomas; S=lenggenhager; O=switch; P=switch; A=arcom; C=ch;