Re: rfc 1384
Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager@gate.switch.ch> Thu, 07 July 1994 06:59 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23947; 7 Jul 94 2:59 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa23943; 7 Jul 94 2:59 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00271; 7 Jul 94 2:59 EDT
X400-Received: by mta haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk in /PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; Relayed; Thu, 7 Jul 1994 07:18:47 +0100
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 1994 07:18:47 +0100
X400-Originator: osi-ds-request@cs.ucl.ac.uk
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure:;
X400-MTS-Identifier: [/PRMD=uk.ac/ADMD=gold 400/C=gb/; haig.cs.uc.963:07.06.94.06.18.47]
Priority: Non-Urgent
DL-Expansion-History: osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk ; Thu, 7 Jul 1994 07:18:46 +0100;
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Thomas Lenggenhager <lenggenhager@gate.switch.ch>
Message-ID: <13274*/S=lenggenhager/OU=gate/O=switch/PRMD=switch/ADMD=arcom/C=ch/@MHS>
To: Jason Cross <jcross01@eng.eds.com>
Cc: osi-ds <osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <199407062048.AA21850@gmlink.gmeds.com>
Subject: Re: rfc 1384
Jason Cross wrote: > I just read the doco called "Naming and Structuring Guidelines > for X.500 Directory Pilots". The Abstract states this doco will > replace rfc 1384. Does this mean that rfc 1384 will be obsolete > and a new rfc number assigned to this doco, or will this doco > have rfc 1384 stamped on it? RFCs get always new numbers when they are changed. RFC1617 replaces RFC1384. > Is it standard practice to have leaf objects (people and devices) > under the same non-leaf object, or is it more sensible to create > a non-leaf object to separate people and devices. To better > explain here's an example: > > ... > | > ou=sales > | > -------------- > | | > cn=John Smith cn= Unix Server 1 > > > OR > > ... > | > ou=sales > | > -------------- > | | > xx=?? yy=?? > | | > cn=John Smith cn=Unix Server 1 > > > If the second is acceptable then what object class would I > use for the non-leaf objects xx and yy? In case there are not just a few entries for persons and machines I would seperate them into different ou branches, e.g.: ou=staff and ou=servers Thomas =============================================================================== SWITCH - The Swiss Academic and Research Network Thomas Lenggenhager, SWITCH, Limmatquai 138, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland INET: lenggenhager@switch.ch | Tel: +41 1 268 1540 | Fax: +41 1 268 1568 X.400: G=thomas; S=lenggenhager; O=switch; P=switch; A=arcom; C=ch;
- rfc 1384 Jason Cross
- Re: rfc 1384 Thomas Lenggenhager