RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper
"Joe Macker" <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil> Wed, 22 December 2004 16:36 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10370; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:36:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ch9dY-0003g3-EL; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:46:56 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ch9LX-00082w-HZ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:28:19 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ch9K5-00070H-Ft for ospf-wireless-design@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:26:49 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08539 for <ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:26:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil ([132.250.83.3]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ch9Tj-0003N0-VH for ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:36:49 -0500
Received: from smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.86.3]) by s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8) with SMTP id iBMGQ8bc017425; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:26:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200412221626.iBMGQ8bc017425@s2.itd.nrl.navy.mil>
Received: (from SEXTANT [132.250.92.22]) by smtp.itd.nrl.navy.mil (SMSSMTP 4.0.5.66) with SMTP id M2004122211260714384 ; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:26:07 -0500
From: Joe Macker <joseph.macker@nrl.navy.mil>
To: "'Madhavi W. Chandra'" <mchandra@cisco.com>, 'Tao Lin' <tlin_mcmaster@yahoo.ca>
Subject: RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:29:38 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
In-Reply-To: <20041221174612.GB11454@cisco.com>
Thread-Index: AcTnhzbYZL89hwzzSjOixOpapXbs+gAtONIw
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: OSPF Wireless Design Team <ospf-wireless-design.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/ospf-wireless-design>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On another note, is it fair to say that a source-independent CDS algorithm is actually more *dependent* on all of the nodes behaving 'ideally'...running the same selection algorithm, agreeing on their IDs, etc....whereas a source-dependent overlapping relays/MPR algorithm is more flexible? Regards, Madhavi ------------------------------ Madhavi: There are many tradeoffs, I would agree you point out one. For instance, you can easily have difference election heuristics at different nodes assuming you meet the basic requirements of a localized 2-hop CDS. There is likely "no one size fits all" for every scenario, but I assume our job is to converge on an approach. There is alot to be said for "source dependent" approaches but this might not be the goal for OSPF-MANET. _______________________________________________ Ospf-wireless-design mailing list Ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design
- [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Madhavi W. Chandra
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- RE: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Joe Macker
- FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Tao Lin
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Tao Lin
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Acee Lindem
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Madhavi W. Chandra
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Tao Lin
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Abhay Roy
- RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Joe Macker
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Tao Lin
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Tao Lin
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Abhay Roy
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Joe Macker
- RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Henderson, Thomas R
- RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Green, David B RDECOM CERDEC STCD SRI
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- RE: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Spagnolo, Phillip A
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier
- Re: FW: [Ospf-wireless-design] Tao Lin paper Richard Ogier