[OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-09: (with COMMENT)

"Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 28 June 2016 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACFA12DDBB; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 03:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160628102033.24195.4661.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 03:20:33 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/-9W03ixq3c0HwadvCsSvAC_405U>
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3@ietf.org, ospf-chairs@ietf.org, wenhu.lu@gmail.com
Subject: [OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:20:33 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nit: „Further work such as [ipsecospf] would be required to support IPsec
protection for OSPFv3 over IPv4 transport.“ -> I guess that should mean
OSPFv2 here...?