Re: [OSPF] Removal of MOSPF from OSPFv3

Vincent Nogues <vincent.nogues@teamlog.com> Fri, 03 August 2007 07:12 UTC

Return-path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGrLG-0005ZZ-1Z; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:12:58 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGrLD-0005ZL-Rg for ospf@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:12:55 -0400
Received: from smtp-rennes1.teamlog.com ([194.206.222.69] helo=mail1-rennes1.teamlog.fr) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGrLA-00086l-GS for ospf@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:12:55 -0400
Received: from teamlog.com by paris.teamlog.com (x.x.x/x.x.x) with ESMTP id l737C55J019280; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:12:05 +0200
Message-ID: <46B2D4AC.9080608@teamlog.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 09:09:32 +0200
From: Vincent Nogues <vincent.nogues@teamlog.com>
Organization: TEAMLOG
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Erblichs <erblichs@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Removal of MOSPF from OSPFv3
References: <66A3A59B-F3DA-437C-9107-67C36A4B93F7@redback.com> <4B7DAC3FEFD35D4A96BDD011699050140A4245F9@zrtphxm1.corp.nortel.com> <93E269EB-87EB-4B6F-B212-B3E15C049B55@redback.com> <46B21BEF.F72A2FB2@earthlink.net> <D6ACB2DD-BBB5-44FA-9B41-B7B4FB594810@redback.com> <46B25A86.72B967B9@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <46B25A86.72B967B9@earthlink.net>
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail1-rennes1.teamlog.fr id l737C55J019280
X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 15dcd85cefdc68de5c59786f9c752931
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1985302798=="
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

I don't know any MOSPF implementation for IPv6. However, maybe, we will developp such an implementation in the coming months. This project is not yet definitive, so I would appreciate if this removal could be postponed.

Thanks,
T-signature-MY

---------------------------------------------------

Vincent NOGUES

---------------------------------------------------




Erblichs a écrit :
Yes Acee, I think we did,

	Are you 100% sure that NO-ONE generated a MOSPF 
	implimentation OR used it for something ELSE OR
	if this bit is set is going to do WEIRD things.
	If not then WHY NOT be as careful as possible?

	I just think that this isn't the ONLY thing in the
	current or future that COULD/SHOULD be DEPRECATED.

	We could let a larger audience OUTSIDE of this
	mail alias be AWARE that this/these things are intended
	to be DEPRCATED/REMOVED.

	It has been around for years?
	Document it for 6 months, and set a clock, and MAYBE 
	 have implimentations check whether this bit is set?
	 However, this last bit introduces the chicken and 
	 egg problem, That's why it needs to be a 1-time FYI
	 msg if generated.

	Then get rid of it...

	Then the issue comes into play about routers no longer
	 having their supftware updated who IGNORE this bit
         once it is re-used.

	Mitchell Erblich
	------------------

	

Acee Lindem wrote:
  
Mitchell,
We've discussed this before (at least once). Nobody (to the best of
my knowledge) has implemented MOSPF for OSPFv3. If they have, they
should come forward with a complete specification since there were
things missing from RFC 2740 (e.g., the definition of the group LSAs).

Thanks,
Acee
On Aug 2, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Erblichs wrote:

    
Acee Lindem and group,

      IMO, OSPF needs to have some form
      of formal DEPRECATION policy.

      WOULD it be more prudent to suggest first
      generating some type of DEPRECATED statement?

      This is common in OSs when a feature is about
      to be removed in one of the next releases.
      Doing so ONLY in the context of a mail alias
      limits the notification to a limited audience.

      IMO, that COULD be done by checking the bit
      in the hello and if set generating the msg
      one time per intf.

      In theory, the DEPRECATE statement would suggest
      sending a email to the ospf@ietf.org mailing list
      identifying the manufacturer and the box in
      question.

      This could be done for 1 release time of say
      6 months to VERIFY that no-one is using that
      bit..

      Currently I believe the v3 spec says to ignore
      a capability bit that is not understood. So, it
      would quietly ignore if that bit is set.

      IFF this suggestion would be followed, then the
      appropriate sections within the RFC get changed
      to state that this item is being DEPRECATED, and
      that anyone wishing to notify of any possible
      conflict should send a email to the ospf@ietf.org
      mail alias.

      THis would cover ALL users who MIGHT be using
      a non-conformant and/or legacy (not currently in
      business) router and people who read the ospf RFCs
      but do not subscibe to the mail alias.

      In the legal sense, I believe this would be equal
      to "Due Diligence".

      Mitchell Erblich
      --------------------







Acee Lindem wrote:
      
Hi Dan,

On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Daniel Joyal wrote:

        
This also has an impact to the OSPFv3 MIB which has multicast-
specific
objects that would need to be removed.
          
Yup. ospfv3MulticastExtensions and ospfv3IfMulticastForwarding could
be removed. Anything else?

Thanks,
Acee

        
-Dan

          
-----Original Message-----
From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee@redback.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 6:03 PM
To: OSPF List
Subject: [OSPF] Removal of MOSPF from OSPFv3

MOSPF has never really been fully specified in RFC 2740 and,
to the best of my knowledge, has never been implemented.
Hence, we again had some discussions about removing it from
the respin. I've made the changes but have not submitting
them. I've also attempted to reclaim the MC-bit in the prefix
options since this was never fully specified either and has
proved to be grossly inadequate to separate unicast and
multicast topologies. Please send comments ASAP. If I don't
hear any serious dissent I'll submit the update and we'll do
a quick re-WGLC.

Thanks,
Acee

***************
*** 82,89 ****
      addition, option handling has been made more flexible.

      All of OSPF for IPv4's optional capabilities, including
demand
!    circuit support, Not-So-Stubby Areas (NSSAs), and the
multicast
!    extensions to OSPF (MOSPF) are also supported in OSPF for
IPv6.



--- 82,89 ----
      addition, option handling has been made more flexible.

      All of OSPF for IPv4's optional capabilities, including
demand
!    circuit support and Not-So-Stubby Areas (NSSAs) are also
supported in
!    OSPF for IPv6.



***************
*** 828,844 ****
      LSAs, network-LSAs, inter-area-prefix-LSAs,
inter-area-router- LSAs,
      and intra-area-prefix-LSAs.  LSAs with unknown LS type,
U-bit set to
      1 (flood even when unrecognized) and area scope also
appear in the
!    area data structure.  IPv6 routers implementing MOSPF add
group-
!    membership-LSAs to the area data structure.  NSSA-LSAs are
also
!    included in an NSSA area's data structure.





! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 15]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


   3.1.2.  The Interface Data structure
--- 828,844 ----
      LSAs, network-LSAs, inter-area-prefix-LSAs,
inter-area-router- LSAs,
      and intra-area-prefix-LSAs.  LSAs with unknown LS type,
U-bit set to
      1 (flood even when unrecognized) and area scope also
appear in the
!    area data structure.  NSSA-LSAs are also included in an
NSSA area's
!    data structure.
!





! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 15]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


   3.1.2.  The Interface Data structure
***************
*** 1086,1094 ****
      o  The Options field within Database Description
packets has moved
         around, getting larger in the process.  More options
bits are now
         possible.  Those that MUST be set correctly in Database
!       Description packets are: The MC-bit is set if and only
if the
!       router is forwarding multicast datagrams according to
the MOSPF
!       specification in [MOSPF], and the DC-bit is set if and only
if the
         router wishes to suppress the sending of Hellos over
the interface
         (see [DEMAND]).  Unrecognized bits in the Database
Description
         packet's Options field should be cleared.
--- 1086,1092 ----
      o  The Options field within Database Description
packets has moved
         around, getting larger in the process.  More options
bits are now
         possible.  Those that MUST be set correctly in Database
!       Description packets are: The DC-bit is set if and only
if the
         router wishes to suppress the sending of Hellos over
the interface
         (see [DEMAND]).  Unrecognized bits in the Database
Description
         packet's Options field should be cleared.
***************
*** 1577,1591 ****
      should be set unless the router will not participate in
transit
IPv6
      routing.  The E-bit should be clear if and only if the
attached area
      is an OSPF stub or OSPF NSSA area.  The E-bit should
always be set in
!    AS scoped LSAs.  The MC-bit should be set if and only if
the router
!    is running MOSPF and the LSA is to be used in the multicast
SPF
!    computation (see [MOSPF]).  The N-bit should be set if
and only if
!    the attached area is an OSPF NSSA area.  The R-bit should
be set
!    unless the router will not participate in any transit
routing.  The
!    DC-bit should be set if and only if the router can correctly
process
!    the DoNotAge bit when it appears in the LS age field of LSAs
(see
!    [DEMAND]).  All unrecognized bits in the Options field
should be
!    cleared.

      The V6-bit and R-bit are only examined in Router-LSAs
during the SPF
      computation.  In other LSA types containing options,
they are set for
--- 1577,1588 ----
      should be set unless the router will not participate in
transit
IPv6
      routing.  The E-bit should be clear if and only if the
attached area
      is an OSPF stub or OSPF NSSA area.  The E-bit should
always be set in
!    AS scoped LSAs.  The N-bit should be set if and only if the
attached
!    area is an OSPF NSSA area.  The R-bit should be set unless the
router
!    will not participate in any transit routing.  The DC-bit
should be
!    set if and only if the router can correctly process the
DoNotAge
bit
!    when it appears in the LS age field of LSAs (see
[DEMAND]).  All
!    unrecognized bits in the Options field should be cleared.

      The V6-bit and R-bit are only examined in Router-LSAs
during the SPF
      computation.  In other LSA types containing options,
they are set for
***************
*** 1603,1610 ****
      State ID fields.

      To the left of the Options field, the router capability
bits V, E,
!    and B should be set according to Section 12.4.1 of
[OSPFV2].  Bit W
!    should be coded according to [MOSPF].

      Each of the router's interfaces to the area are then
described by
      appending "link descriptions" to the router-LSA.  Each link
--- 1600,1606 ----
      State ID fields.

      To the left of the Options field, the router capability
bits V, E,
!    and B should be set according to Section 12.4.1 of [OSPFV2].

      Each of the router's interfaces to the area are then
described by
      appending "link descriptions" to the router-LSA.  Each link
***************
*** 1732,1748 ****



! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 31]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


         Designated Router.

      o  The Options field in the network-LSA is set to the
logical OR of
         the Options fields contained within the link's
associated link-
!       LSAs.  In this way, the network link exhibits a capability
when at
!       least one of the link's routers requests that the
capability be
         advertised.

      As an example, assuming that Router RT4 has been
elected Designated
--- 1732,1749 ----



! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 31]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


         Designated Router.

      o  The Options field in the network-LSA is set to the
logical OR of
         the Options fields contained within the link's
associated link-
!       LSAs corresponding to fully adjacent neighbors.  In
this way,
the
!       network link exhibits a capability when at least one fully
!       adjacent neighbor on the link requests that the
capability be
         advertised.

      As an example, assuming that Router RT4 has been
elected Designated
***************
*** 1787,1801 ****



!
! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 32]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


!    o  The NU-bit in the PrefixOptions field should be clear.  The
coding
!       of the MC-bit depends upon whether, and if so how, MOSPF is
!       operating in the routing domain (see [MOSPF]).

      o  Link-local addresses MUST never be advertised in inter-
area-
         prefix-LSAs.
--- 1788,1799 ----



! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 32]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


!    o  The NU-bit in the PrefixOptions field should be clear.

      o  Link-local addresses MUST never be advertised in inter-
area-
         prefix-LSAs.
***************
*** 1894,1916 ****
         Address Prefix fields embedded within the LSA body.
Network Mask
         is no longer specified.

!    o  The NU-bit in the PrefixOptions field should be clear.  The
coding
!       of the MC-bit depends upon whether, and if so how, MOSPF is
!       operating in the routing domain (see [MOSPF]).
!




- Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 34]
-

- Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


!    o  Link-local addresses can never be advertised in AS-
external-
LSAs.

-    o  The forwarding address is present in the
AS-external-LSA if and
-       only if the AS-external-LSA's bit F is set.

      o  The external route tag is present in the
AS-external-LSA if and
         only if the AS-external-LSA's bit T is set.
--- 1892,1911 ----
         Address Prefix fields embedded within the LSA body.
Network Mask
         is no longer specified.

!    o  The NU-bit in the PrefixOptions field should be clear.

+    o  Link-local addresses can never be advertised in AS-
external-
LSAs.

+    o  The forwarding address is present in the
AS-external-LSA if and
+       only if the AS-external-LSA's bit F is set.




! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 34]
!

! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


      o  The external route tag is present in the
AS-external-LSA if and
         only if the AS-external-LSA's bit T is set.
***************
*** 1982,1990 ****
         Address Prefix fields embedded within the LSA body.
Network
Mask
         is no longer specified.

!    o  The NU-bit in the PrefixOptions field should be clear.  The
coding
!       of the MC-bit depends upon whether, and if so how, MOSPF is
!       operating in the routing domain (see [MOSPF]).

      o  Link-local addresses can never be advertised in NSSA-LSAs.

--- 1971,1977 ----
         Address Prefix fields embedded within the LSA body.
Network
Mask
         is no longer specified.

!    o  The NU-bit in the PrefixOptions field should be clear.

      o  Link-local addresses can never be advertised in NSSA-LSAs.

***************
*** 2450,2475 ****
      area-prefix-LSAs (0x2003), inter-area-router-LSAs (0x2004),
NSSA-LSAs
      (0x2007), AS-external-LSAs (0x4005), link-LSAs (0x0008), and
Intra-
      Area-Prefix-LSAs (0x2009) are assumed to be understood by all
!    routers.  However, not all LS types are understood by
all routers,
!    For example, the group-membership-LSA (0x2006) is understood
only by
!    MOSPF routers and since it has its U-bit set to 0.  This LS
Type
!    should only be flooded to a non-MOSPF neighbor (determined by
!    examining the MC-bit in the neighbor's Database Description
packets'
!    Options field) when the neighbor is Designated Router or
Backup
!    Designated Router for the attached link.
!
!    The previous paragraph solves a problem for IPv4 OSPF
extensions
such
!
!
!
! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 44]
!

! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007
!
!
!    as MOSPF, which require that the Designated Router support the
!    extension in order to have the new LSA types flooded across
broadcast
!    and NBMA networks (see Section 10.2 of [MOSPF]).

   3.5.3.  Installing LSAs in the database

--- 2422,2436 ----
      area-prefix-LSAs (0x2003), inter-area-router-LSAs (0x2004),
NSSA-LSAs
      (0x2007), AS-external-LSAs (0x4005), link-LSAs (0x0008), and
Intra-
      Area-Prefix-LSAs (0x2009) are assumed to be understood by all
!    routers.  However, all LS types MAY not be understood by all
routers.
!    For example, a new LSA type with its U-bit set to 0 MAY
only be
!    understood by a subset of routers.  This new LS Type
should only be
!    flooded to an OSPF neighbor that understands the LS type
or when
the
!    neighbor that doesn't understand it is Designated Router
or Backup
!    Designated Router for the attached link.  This allows
the LSA to be
!    flooded on the local link even if either the router elected
!    Designated Router or Backup Designated Router doesn't
understand
the
!    LS type.

   3.5.3.  Installing LSAs in the database

***************
*** 3395,3406 ****
      neighbor relationships from forming (e.g., the E-bit
below); these
      mismatches are discovered through the sending and
receiving of
Hello
      packets.  Some option mismatches prevent particular LSA
types from
!    being flooded across adjacencies (e.g., the MC-bit
below); these
are
!    discovered through the sending and receiving of Database
Description
!    packets.  Some option mismatches prevent routers from being
included
!    in one or more of the various routing calculations
because of their
!    reduced functionality (again, the MC-bit is an example); these
!    mismatches are discovered by examining LSAs.

      Seven bits of the OSPF Options field have been assigned.
Each
bit is
      described briefly below.  Routers should reset (i.e., clear)
--- 3395,3405 ----
      neighbor relationships from forming (e.g., the E-bit
below); these
      mismatches are discovered through the sending and
receiving of
Hello
      packets.  Some option mismatches prevent particular LSA
types from
!    being flooded across adjacencies these are discovered through
the
!    sending and receiving of Database Description packets.
Some option
!    mismatches prevent routers from being included in one or
more of
the
!    various routing calculations because of their reduced
functionality;
!    these mismatches are discovered by examining LSAs.

      Seven bits of the OSPF Options field have been assigned.
Each
bit is
      described briefly below.  Routers should reset (i.e., clear)
***************
*** 3414,3429 ****



! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 61]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


                                  1                    2
!            0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  9 0  1  2  3
!           +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--+--+
!           | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |*|*|DC|R|N|MC| E|V6|
!           +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+--+--+--+

                              The Options field

--- 3413,3429 ----



!
! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 61]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


                                  1                    2
!            0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  9 0 1  2  3
!           +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+--+--+
!           | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |*|*|DC|R|N|x| E|V6|
!           +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+--+--+

                              The Options field

***************
*** 3438,3446 ****
         This bit describes the way AS-external-LSAs are
flooded, as
         described in Sections 3.6, 9.5, 10.8, and 12.1.2 of
[OSPFV2].

!    MC-bit
!       This bit describes whether IP multicast datagrams are
forwarded
!       according to the specifications in [MOSPF].

      N-bit
         This bit indicates whether or not the router is
attached to an
--- 3438,3447 ----
         This bit describes the way AS-external-LSAs are
flooded, as
         described in Sections 3.6, 9.5, 10.8, and 12.1.2 of
[OSPFV2].

!    x-Bit
!       This bit was previously used by MOSPF (see [MOSPF])
which has
been
!       deprecated for OSPFv3.  It should be set to 0 and ignored
upon
!       reception.  It may be reused in the future.

      N-bit
         This bit indicates whether or not the router is
attached to an
***************
*** 4021,4038 ****
      cases or are to be marked as not readvertisable in others.

                        0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7
!                     +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
!                     |  |  |  |DN| P|MC|LA|NU|
!                     +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+






! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 72]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


                            The Prefix Options field
--- 4021,4038 ----
      cases or are to be marked as not readvertisable in others.

                        0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7
!                     +--+--+--+--+--+-+--+--+
!                     |  |  |  |DN| P|x|LA|NU|
!                     +--+--+--+--+--+-+--+--+






! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 72]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


                            The Prefix Options field
***************
*** 4050,4059 ****
         Section 3.4.3.9.  An implementation MAY also set the
LA-bit for
         prefixes advertised with a host PrefixLength (128).

!    MC-bit
!       The "multicast" capability bit.  If set, the prefix
should be
!       included in IPv6 multicast routing calculations.  If
not set, it
!       should be excluded.

      P-bit
         The "propagate" bit.  Set on NSSA area prefixes that
should be
--- 4050,4060 ----
         Section 3.4.3.9.  An implementation MAY also set the
LA-bit for
         prefixes advertised with a host PrefixLength (128).

!    x-bit
!       This bit was previously defined as a "multicast"
capability bit.
!       However, the use was never adequately specified and
it is being
!       deprecated.  It is set to 0 and ignored upon reception.  It
may be
!       reused in the future.

      P-bit
         The "propagate" bit.  Set on NSSA area prefixes that
should be
***************
*** 4193,4209 ****

      The LSA function codes are defined as follows.  The
origination
and
      processing of these LSA function codes are defined
elsewhere in
this
!    document, except for the group-membership-LSA (see
[MOSPF]) and the
!    NSSA-LSA (see [NSSA]).  As shown below, each LSA
function code also



! Coltun, et al.          Expires November 12, 2007
[Page 75]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
    May
2007


!    implies a specific setting for the U, S1, and S2 bits.


               LSA function code   LS Type   Description
--- 4193,4210 ----

      The LSA function codes are defined as follows.  The
origination
and
      processing of these LSA function codes are defined
elsewhere in
this
!    document, except for the NSSA-LSA (see [NSSA]) and
0x2006 which was
!    previously used by MOSPF (see [MOSPF]).  MOSPF has been
deprecated



! Coltun, et al.          Expires February 2, 2008
[Page 75]


! Internet-Draft                OSPF for IPv6
 August
2007


!    for OSPFv3.  As shown below, each LSA function code also
implies a
!    specific setting for the U, S1, and S2 bits.


               LSA function code   LS Type   Description
***************
*** 4213,4219 ****
               3                   0x2003    Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA
               4                   0x2004    Inter-Area-Router-LSA
               5                   0x4005    AS-external-LSA
!             6                   0x2006    Group-membership-LSA
               7                   0x2007    NSSA-LSA
               8                   0x0008    Link-LSA
               9                   0x2009    Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA
--- 4214,4220 ----
               3                   0x2003    Inter-Area-Prefix-LSA
               4                   0x2004    Inter-Area-Router-LSA
               5                   0x4005    AS-external-LSA
!             6                   0x2006    Deprecated (May be
reused)
               7                   0x2007    NSSA-LSA
               8                   0x0008    Link-LSA
               9                   0x2009    Intra-Area-Prefix-LSA
***************
*** 4272,4278 ****

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
         |        LS Checksum             |
Length             |

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
!       |  0  |Nt|W|V|E|B|
Options                            |

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
         |     Type       |       0       |
Metric               |

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
--- 4272,4278 ----

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
         |        LS Checksum             |
Length             |

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
!       |  0  |Nt|x|V|E|B|
Options                            |

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
         |     Type       |       0       |
Metric               |

+-+-+-+--+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
+-+-+
***************
*** 4326,4336 ****
      Bit B
         When set, the router is an area border router (B is for
border).

!    Bit W
!       When set, the router is a wild-card multicast receiver.
When
!       running MOSPF, these routers receive all multicast
datagrams,
!       regardless of destination.  See Sections 3, 4, and A.2 of
[MOSPF]
!       for details.

      Bit Nt
         When set, the router is an NSSA border router that is
--- 4326,4335 ----
      Bit B
         When set, the router is an area border router (B is for
border).

!    Bit x
!       This bit was previously used by MOSPF (see [MOSPF])
which has
been
!       deprecated for OSPFv3.  It should be set to 0 and ignored
upon
!       reception.  It may be reused in the future.

      Bit Nt
         When set, the router is an NSSA border router that is
***************
*** 5796,5806 ****
--- 5796,5814 ----
      o  Add new prefix options and options field bits added in
this

            
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf" rel="nofollow">https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

  
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf