Re: [OSPF] Fwd: YANG modules publication: what to focus on next?

["t.petch" <[e-mail]>]

Acee

Looking at draft-ietf-ospf-yang, I see that it Normatively references
[RFC6020] (but not RFC7950), the soon-to-be-obsoleted  [RFC7223]
and [RFC8022]  while revised-datastores is only a Informative reference.

Do you plan on changing any of this?.

I note that the import statements do not specify a revision date.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Benoit Claise" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 11:30 AM

> Dear all,
>
> So that you know that draft-ietf-ospf-yang and
> draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg are bottlenecks to publish many YANG
> modules. Please progress them asap.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: YANG modules publication: what to focus on next?
> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 12:27:01 +0100
> From: Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>
> To: NETMOD Working Group <[e-mail]>
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the
publication
> status of most YANG modules.
> Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situation. Let me
> share it with everybody.
>
> Before publishing YANG modules, we have two series of bottlenecks:
> - the YANG module import (shown by tooling below)
> - the normative references (MISSREF in the RFC editor queue
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php>)
>   Note that draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores, a normative
reference
> for many YANG modules,
>   was just approved. Good news!
>
> We now have many YANG modules in RFC editor queue:
> ***draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-18
>
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oa
m>**
> ****draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-13
>
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oa
m-methods>**
> ****draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-16
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology>**
> ****draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-20
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo>**
> ****draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-11
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis>****
> **draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-09
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis>
> *draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-03
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis/>
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-03
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis/>
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-09
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/>
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-08
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip/>
> draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-10
>
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores/>
>
> Here are the YANG module dependencies
>
<https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=i
etf-ip&modules[]=ietf-connectionless-oam&modules[]=ietf-lime-time-types&
modules[]=ietf-connectionless-oam-methods&modules[]=ietf-l3-unicast-topo
logy&modules[]=ietf-l3-unicast-topology-state&modules[]=ietf-network-top
ology&modules[]=ietf-network-topology-state&modules[]=ietf-network&modul
es[]=ietf-network-state&modules[]=ietf-l3vpn-svc&modules[]=ietf-netconf-
acm&modules[]=ietf-interfaces&modules[]=ietf-vrrp&modules[]=ietf-rip&mod
ules[]=ietf-datastores&modules[]=ietf-origin&recurse=1&rfcs=1&show_subm=
1&show_dir=dependencies>
> for these RFC editor modules, as requirement before publishing.
>
> Some more YANG modules are on the IESG table:
>   draft-ietf-pim-yang has a DISCUSS (Jan 11th IESG telechat)
>   draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis is on the Jan 25th IESG telechat
>   draft-ietf-netmod-entity is on the Jan 25th IESG telechat
>
> Assuming those are in the RFC editor queue, this is the new set of
YANG
> module dependencies
>
<https://www.yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis.php?modules[]=i
etf-ip&modules[]=ietf-connectionless-oam&modules[]=ietf-lime-time-types&
modules[]=ietf-connectionless-oam-methods&modules[]=ietf-l3-unicast-topo
logy&modules[]=ietf-l3-unicast-topology-state&modules[]=ietf-network-top
ology&modules[]=ietf-network-topology-state&modules[]=ietf-network&modul
es[]=ietf-network-state&modules[]=ietf-l3vpn-svc&modules[]=ietf-netconf-
acm&modules[]=ietf-interfaces&modules[]=ietf-vrrp&modules[]=ietf-rip&mod
ules[]=ietf-pim-dm&modules[]=ietf-pim-base&modules[]=ietf-pim-sm&modules
[]=ietf-pim-bidir&modules[]=ietf-pim-rp&modules[]=ietf-routing&modules[]
=ietf-ipv6-router-advertisements&modules[]=ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing&mod
ules[]=ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing&modules[]=ietf-entity&modules[]=ietf-da
tastores&modules[]=ietf-origin&recurse=1&rfcs=1&show_subm=1&show_dir=dep
endencies>.
> It takes a little bit of re-arrangering the elements, but all the
> information is there.
>
> The next bottlenecks for publishing those YANG modules are:
>   draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount
>   draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
>   ietf-bfd-yang
>   draft-ietf-ospf-yang
>   draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg
> Please progress those documents asap
>
> Some more updates below.
>
> _NI, LNE, and schema mount, RFC7895bis, schema mount:_
>   draft-ietf-rtgwg-lne-model
>   Status: Publication requested, Alia's AD review
>   draft-ietf-rtgwg-ni-model
>   Status: Publication requested, Alia's AD review
>   draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount:
>   Status: WG LC closed, not sure on the next steps ...
>   draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis
>   Status not clear...
>
> _LIME:_
> draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection-oriented-oam-model-00
>   Status: Benoit to perform the AD review.
>
> Regards, Benoit
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------


> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>