Re: [OSPF] [CCAMP] Updates to ASON Routing for OSPFv2 Protocols (RFC 5787bis) will Update RFC 5786

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 29 November 2011 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FB421F8557 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:50:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.161
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.161 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6SWxP+qBU+f for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CB3521F84C3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:50:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 19882 invoked by uid 0); 29 Nov 2011 11:50:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Nov 2011 11:50:18 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=BVwM90c20D44lOS9WnLUenNteAfFZh3ZMowKQWgKkpo=; b=anAn22Vg90YbpeLTVD02TYinZmbWdLLP2sp/uFj/fvFQaXbwRhm0k/3mHrELclnBgCxmfI+cPr1RUbXyRUGOfTjZ74FLv5n6tH6jybZxz3XVNaLN/nXE5RwaUWIcA0EC;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1RVMCY-0006WG-Ev; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:50:18 -0700
Message-ID: <4ED4C6FE.4040505@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:50:22 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <6343326C-9EFD-4F25-BBE4-E5001887A794@ericsson.com> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF825CAFF00@SZXEML520-MBX.china.huawei.com> <2D6BCF8B-F6AF-40C0-8E63-5AEB29B8D02A@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <2D6BCF8B-F6AF-40C0-8E63-5AEB29B8D02A@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org List" <ospf@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [CCAMP] Updates to ASON Routing for OSPFv2 Protocols (RFC 5787bis) will Update RFC 5786
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:50:20 -0000

Acee,
	Don't you think that addressing the second is a major change enough
change that it should be done in a standalone draft?

Lou

On 11/28/2011 9:58 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> Hi Fatai,
> We have two separate requirements here. The ASON requirement is to be
> able to advertise reachability information for multiple ASON transport
> nodes. As you've noted, there has been an independent requirement to
> advertise more information than will fit in a single LSA. Our draft only
> addresses the first. However, we'll consider this when addressing
> Adrian's comments. Much of this depends on whether or not we do a second
> review and WG last call. 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> On Nov 27, 2011, at 10:11 PM, Zhangfatai wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>  
>> Can this relaxation be applicable to all the future OSFPv2 documents ?
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> Thanks
>>  
>> Fatai
>>  
>> *From:* ospf-bounces@ietf.org
>> <mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Acee Lindem
>> *Sent:* 2011年11月28日 9:14
>> *To:* ospf@ietf.org <mailto:ospf@ietf.org> List
>> *Cc:* ccamp@ietf.org <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* [OSPF] Updates to ASON Routing for OSPFv2 Protocols (RFC
>> 5787bis) will Update RFC 5786
>>  
>> Please note that this document relaxes the RFC 5786  restriction that
>> a Node Attribute TLV may only appear in a single OSPF TE LSA. Here is
>> the text:
>>  
>>    In order to support ASON reachability advertisement, the Node
>>    Attribute TLV defined in [RFC5786] is used to advertise the
>>    combination of a TE Router ID and its set of associated reachable
>>    address prefixes. The Node Attribute TLV can contain the following
>>    sub-TLVs:
>>  
>>       - TE Router ID sub-TLV: Length: 4; Defined in Section 6.2
>>       - Node IPv4 Local Address sub-TLV: Length: variable; [RFC5786]
>>       - Node IPv6 Local Address sub-TLV: Length: variable; [RFC5786]
>>  
>>    A router may support multiple transport nodes as discussed in section
>>    6, and, as a result, may be required to advertise reachability (ASON
>>    SNPPs) separately for each transport node. As a consequence, it MUST
>>    be possible for the router to originate more than one TE LSA
>>    containing the Node Attribute TLV when used for ASON reachability
>>    advertisement.
>>  
>>    Hence, the Node Attribute TLV [RFC5786] advertisement rules must be
>>    relaxed for ASON. A Node Attribute TLV MAY appear in more than one TE
>>    LSA originated by the RC when the RC is advertising reachability
>>    information for a different transport node identified by the Local TE
>>    Router Sub-TLV (refer to section 6.1).
>> Here is a link to the
>> document: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc5787bis-03.txt
>>  
>> If you have any concerns with this change, please send them to this
>> list with the CCAMP list copied. 
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp