discard route, summary of externals and external types
"Kostiner, Assaf (Assaf)" <akostine@AVAYA.COM> Wed, 30 October 2002 08:13 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA05270 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:13:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.0079B742@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 3:15:22 -0500
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 358028 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:15:22 -0500
Received: from 198.152.13.101 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:15:22 -0400
Received: from ierw.net.avaya.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ierw.net.avaya.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA15160 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:13:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com (h135-64-105-51.avaya.com [135.64.105.51]) by ierw.net.avaya.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA15156 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Wed, 30 Oct 2002 03:13:06 -0500 (EST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C27FEC.7BEC788C"
Thread-Topic: discard route, summary of externals and external types
Thread-Index: AcJ/7Glp0AKi0nXOSf+fI6kAF0jKUA==
Message-ID: <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F02505894@IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:15:18 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: "Kostiner, Assaf (Assaf)" <akostine@AVAYA.COM>
Subject: discard route, summary of externals and external types
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Hi, I wonder if anyone knows: 1. Is the command 'summary-address ip-address mask' for summarization of externals a Cisco proprietary, or do other vendors implement it as well? 2. Cisco has a command: : [no]discard-route internal / [no] discard-route external - why would anyone want to prevent a discard route from forming? 3. Until now, i have always worked with externals type 2. Is there any good reason to move to type 1? Any special cases? 4. And last... Does anyone knows what opaque LSA is? The RFC which talks about it, doesn't bring detailed examples of using it, only explains the ospf changes. Thanks for any help, Assaf.
- discard route, summary of externals and external … Kostiner, Assaf (Assaf)
- Re: discard route, summary of externals and exter… Acee Lindem