Extensions to IS-IS and OSPF for Advertising Optional Capabilities

Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Fri, 13 December 2002 21:17 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05545 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:17:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <11.008330C4@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:20:51 -0500
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 480589 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:20:51 -0500
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:20:51 -0500
Received: from redback.com (login003.redback.com [155.53.12.55]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF871EB9AB for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 13:20:49 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3DFA501D.5010304@redback.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:24:45 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Extensions to IS-IS and OSPF for Advertising Optional Capabilities
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This draft was presented at the 55th IETF OSPF WG. At the meeting,
it was concluded that more discussion was needed prior to deciding
whether or not to accept it as a WG document (and we're currently
trying to finish up at least some items on the charter before accepting
new items). At this time, I'd like to initiate that discussion.

[Speaking as WG member]

As one of the draft authors, I believe the draft is the natural way to
overcome the limitation that we have exhausted the available OSPFv2
LSA options bits. While we can't require existing OSPF features to
use this mechanism, it can be very useful for advertising support
of new features. OSPF PCS (Path Computation Server) discovery will be
the first of the new features using the mechanism.

[End Speaking as WG member]


http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-raggarwa-igp-cap-01.txt
--
Acee