[OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4750 (3292)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 23 July 2012 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF7721F866B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.342, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y0i7BbHnzkIE for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5393621F869C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7B34162189; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: djoyal@nortel.com, pgalecki@airvana.com, spencer.giacalone@gmail.com, fred@cisco.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, akr@cisco.com, acee.lindem@ericsson.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120723092102.7B34162189@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 02:21:02 -0700
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, mikek@muonics.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4750 (3292)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:21:10 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4750,
"OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4750&eid=3292

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Michael Kirkham <mikek@muonics.com>

Section: 5

Original Text
-------------
   ospfTrapCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
        STATUS       obsolete
        DESCRIPTION
           "The compliance statement."
        MODULE       -- this module
        MANDATORY-GROUPS { ospfTrapControlGroup }

        GROUP       ospfTrapControlGroup
        DESCRIPTION
           "This group is optional but recommended for all
           OSPF systems."
        ::= { ospfTrapCompliances 1 }

Corrected Text
--------------
   ospfTrapCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
        STATUS       obsolete
        DESCRIPTION
           "The compliance statement."
        MODULE       -- this module
        GROUP       ospfTrapControlGroup
        DESCRIPTION
           "This group is optional but recommended for all
           OSPF systems."
        ::= { ospfTrapCompliances 1 }

Notes
-----
ospfTrapControlGroup is listed both in the MANDATORY-GROUPS clause and in a GROUP clause. Per RFC 2580, Conformance Statements for SMIv2 (brackets added to indicate pertinent rule):

"5.4.2.  Mapping of the GROUP clause

   The GROUP clause, which need not be present, is repeatedly used to
   name each object and notification group which is conditionally
   mandatory for compliance to the MIB module.  The GROUP clause can
   also be used to name unconditionally optional groups.  [A group named
   in a GROUP clause must be absent from the correspondent MANDATORY-
   GROUPS clause.]"

It is listed in both clauses in RFC 1850 as well (which RFC 4750 obsoletes). It is STATUS current in RFC 1850 and STATUS obsolete in 4750; however, obsolete or not, it is not legal according to SMI rules.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC4750 (draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base
Publication Date    : December 2006
Author(s)           : D. Joyal, Ed., P. Galecki, Ed., S. Giacalone, Ed., R. Coltun, F. Baker
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG