Re: RestartState (draft-nguyen-ospf-restart-05.txt)

Liem Nguyen <lhnguyen@CISCO.COM> Wed, 16 February 2005 18:41 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA19590 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:41:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <6.00F92D39@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:41:25 -0500
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 58105112 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:41:17 -0500
Received: from 171.71.176.71 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0l) with TCP; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:41:17 -0500
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2005 10:51:23 -0800
Received: from rtp-iosxdm1.cisco.com (rtp-iosxdm1.cisco.com [64.102.16.214]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j1GIfCq8027254 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (lhnguyen@localhost) by rtp-iosxdm1.cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/CISCO.WS.1.2) id NAA09245 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:41:14 -0500 (EST)
References: <200502161044.j1GAioeO037113@chisato.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <20050216184114.GK7859@rtp-iosxdm1.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:41:14 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Liem Nguyen <lhnguyen@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: RestartState (draft-nguyen-ospf-restart-05.txt)
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <200502161044.j1GAioeO037113@chisato.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
Precedence: list

KASHIMA,

On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:45:01PM +0900, KASHIMA Hiroaki wrote:
> Hello all.
> 
> I have an question when studying 
> draft-nguyen-ospf-{lls,resync,restart}-05.txt.
> 
> Is the purpose of Restart flag (in restart-05.txt)
> only for Section 2.3?

Its use is mentioned in 2.2.
It's needed regardless of the configuration setting in 2.3.


> In other words,  is this flag not necessary 
> when the configuration is not implemented?
> 
> Thanks in regards.
> --
> KASHIMA, Hiroaki <kashima@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Software group,
> SystemFront Division, Fujitsu Ltd

-- 

Liem Nguyen