Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit-01.txt to both lists
Tom Petch <nwnetworks@DIAL.PIPEX.COM> Wed, 19 November 2003 17:15 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27659 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:15:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <21.00C4E33A@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:15:30 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 61172448 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:15:22 -0500
Received: from 62.241.160.193 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:15:22 -0500
Received: from tom3 (1Cust213.tnt1.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net [62.188.130.213]) by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 639454C00567 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:15:21 +0000 (GMT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Message-ID: <002001c3aec0$3f8a7be0$0301a8c0@tom3>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 17:09:19 -0000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Tom Petch <nwnetworks@DIAL.PIPEX.COM>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2547-dnbit-01.txt to both lists
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Three thoughts, first two editorial. 1) In the abstract, I would like the text to include LSA Header in the reference to options, as OSPF has options in other places 2) Throughout, VPN-IP address should be VPN-IPv4 address as in (mostly) the base VPN documents 3) The dn bit stops OSPF route calculation. What about other OSPF processing? I assume that the LSA will be put in the topological database, aged, flooded etc just as if dn was not set. In which case, or if not, I would like that specifically stated. Tom Petch
- Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2547-… Rohit Dube
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2… Tom Petch
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2… Rohit Dube
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2… Tom Petch
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2… Eric Rosen
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2… Tom Petch
- Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-ospf-2… Rohit Dube