Re: draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt

Acee Lindem <acee@CISCO.COM> Mon, 20 February 2006 15:15 UTC

Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBClE-0004tD-HZ for ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:36 -0500
Received: from wildebeest.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FBClC-0001hx-9Y for ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:36 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (lists.state.gov) by wildebeest.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <10.0002F383@wildebeest.ease.lsoft.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:33 -0500
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 99921552 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:33 -0500
Received: from 64.102.122.149 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0m) with TCP; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:33 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2006 10:15:34 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,130,1139202000"; d="scan'208"; a="82772207:sNHT31055280"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k1KFFCLf003399 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:29 -0500
Received: from [10.82.240.109] ([10.82.240.109]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <43F63D76.4030009@cisco.com> <000b01c635cb$cddcca30$610c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2006 15:15:28.0926 (UTC) FILETIME=[7BC1B3E0:01C63630]
Message-ID: <43F9DD10.8040305@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:15:28 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <000b01c635cb$cddcca30$610c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Precedence: list
List-Help: <http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OSPF>, <mailto:LISTSERV@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM?body=INFO+OSPF>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:OSPF-unsubscribe-request@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:OSPF-subscribe-request@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
List-Owner: <mailto:OSPF-request@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
List-Archive: <http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=OSPF>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336

Hi Zengjie,

Zengjie Kou wrote:

>Hi,Acee,
>    If a router interface whose role is changed(e.g.DR goes down), the router will notify all routers about the change by immediate hello.
>  
>
This is only when the DR/BDR knows that it is going down or the case 
where the router
priority is set to 0.

For a router becoming DR/BDR, all the routers should elect the same DR/BDR
so I don't see how it helps.

Thanks,
Acee

> After all router get the change, election will be reprocessed. In contrast to normal hello, immediate hello avoid the backupSeen.
> Namely, improving convergence.
>
>Thanks a lot,
>Zengjie
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Acee Lindem" <acee@CISCO.COM>
>To: <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
>Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 5:17 AM
>Subject: draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt
>
>
>  
>
>>Hi Zengjie,
>>
>>Under what situations does having the router who changed to/from
>>DR/BDR improve convergence (section 6.2)? Since DR/BDR election
>>is a distributed algorithm dependent on the calculating routers state, it
>>seems this won't help in all that many cases.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Acee
>>    
>>
>
>  
>