FW: draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-00.txt
Oliver Carter <Oliver.Carter@DATACONNECTION.COM> Thu, 04 December 2003 13:39 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24818 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <5.00C659DE@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 8:39:39 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 63040761 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:39:37 -0500
Received: from 192.91.191.4 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 08:29:37 -0500
Received: by coltrane.datcon.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <YG3P45L1>; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:29:29 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <37701240971DD31193970000F6CCB9F704EA5507@duke.datcon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:29:35 -0000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Oliver Carter <Oliver.Carter@DATACONNECTION.COM>
Subject: FW: draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-00.txt
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Reposting to the list - now I've updated my e-mail address :-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Carter > Sent: 04 December 2003 13:20 > To: 'Acee Lindem' > Cc: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM > Subject: draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-00.txt > > Acee, > > Thanks for publishing this draft. I have a question about section 2.1 3rd > Para of it. > > <SNIP> > The final difference was in whether or not additional extensions were > implemented to accommodate other features such as protocol redistribution > or interaction with MPLS VPNs [VPN]. Two vendors implemented extensions > and three did not. It should be noted that such extensions are beyond the > scope of Graceful OSPF Restart [GRACE]. > </SNIP> > > Do you know what additional extensions were implemented? What are the > issues with running Graceful OSPF restart in an MPLS VPN scenario? > > Regards > > Oli > > P.S. I couldn't find anything related to this on the OSPF or L3VPN mailing > lists - feel free to point me at previous posts if this has been discussed > before. >
- FW: draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-00.txt Oliver Carter
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-00.txt Acee Lindem
- Re: draft-ietf-ospf-graceful-impl-report-00.txt Acee Lindem