[OSPF] Re: New OSPF MIB module for TE and GMPLS

Adrian Farrel wrote:

>Hi,
>
>As originators of the GMPLS extensions for OSPF (RFC4203) the CCAMP
>working group has a responsibility to develop a MIB module for the
>management and modelling of these extensions. At the same time, we
>observed that there is currently no MIB module for the TE extensions
>described in RFC3630.
>
>We have started a work item in draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-mib-00.txt to
>provide this support and we would welcome ongoing review and input from
>the OSPF working group. Comments on the CCAMP mailing list or direct to
>the authors or chairs.
>
>If there is a strong feeling that the work should be in the OSPF working
>group we are open to negotiation. In particular, I notice that
>draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-10.txt is still in progress,
>  
>
Since we've kept the TE extensions and base OSPF separate, I'd prefer to 
keep the MIB drafts
separate as well. With respect to draft-ietf-ospf-mib-update-10.txt, 
this draft has been in
progress since I became OSPF WG co-chair (more than 3 years ago) and I'd 
prefer to
progress it now that I believe we are very close to requesting 
publication. If we keep pulling it
back and adding MIB objects for new extensions we'll never finish.

I'll take a look at draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-mib-00.txt.

Thanks,
Acee

>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf