IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] Solicit comments to OSPF LSA flushing problem statement and mitigation solution

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7DD129575 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:58:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WOTn7ayDPwb for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62CE5129532 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:58:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DAR63213; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:58:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:58:02 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:57:53 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Solicit comments to OSPF LSA flushing problem statement and mitigation solution
Thread-Index: AdJAjyBqJ6anY66LSUWLZgx2zedaTg==
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:57:53 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927935503B4@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.114.216]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927935503B4NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.582D38DD.00FB, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 6d0199376d84f3cfb2b0c2e31abb6e97
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/D8kJ8dGjo2nN-na9Cya9hu9jenY>
Cc: "Zhangxudong (zhangxudong, VRP)" <zhangxudong@huawei.com>, "lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com" <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>
Subject: [OSPF] Solicit comments to OSPF LSA flushing problem statement and mitigation solution
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:58:09 -0000

Dear all,

Due to time limit, at the OSPF meeting we didn't have much time to discuss the two drafts related to OSPF LSA flushing problem.

The coauthors would like to encourage comments and discussion about both the problem statement and the mitigation solution.

Here is the link to the slides:

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-ospf-ospf-maxage-flooding-00.pdf

Best regards,
Jie/Zhenqiang/Xudong

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email