Re: NSSA RFC
Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Wed, 19 May 2004 18:13 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA27976 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 19 May 2004 14:13:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.00DB6B64@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 19 May 2004 14:13:45 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 17412269 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 19 May 2004 14:13:43 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 19 May 2004 14:13:43 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B961E6BCCC0 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 19 May 2004 11:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24709-10 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 19 May 2004 11:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aceeinspiron (unknown [172.31.253.182]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AAC9F6BCCC5 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 19 May 2004 11:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20040518122242.49374.qmail@web20107.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0041_01C43DAB.7A931CE0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Message-ID: <004401c43dcd$022b2af0$0302a8c0@aceeinspiron>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 14:13:37 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: NSSA RFC
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Hi 张 江平 , I don't think we need a new NSSA for OSPFv3 other than RFC 3101. One obvious omission from RFC 2740 is that a forwarding address for an NSSA or AS external LSA must not be a link local address. We'll add this if we ever re-spin RFC 2740. Thanks, Acee ----- Original Message ----- From: 张 江平 To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 8:22 AM Subject: NSSA RFC Hi all, Does OSPFv3 support NSSA now, RFC2740 has defined the type for NSSA, do we need another NSSA rfc the same as RFC3101 for OSPFv3? thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Do You Yahoo!? 嫌邮箱太小？雅虎电邮自助扩容！
- NSSA RFC 张 江平
- Re: NSSA RFC Acee Lindem