Re: [OSPF] Joint L3VPN & OSPF WG LC for draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07

Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk> Thu, 14 April 2011 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFB6E07FD; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.304, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uw0QkGpul2We; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailex.mailcore.me (mailex.mailcore.me [94.136.40.61]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D208FE0791; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host1.cachelogic.com ([212.44.43.80] helo=dhcp-108-devlan.cachelogic.com) by mail10.atlas.pipex.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>) id 1QARwg-0007GI-Gn; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:11:14 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <0636D1EB-942D-4416-858E-E698863B141C@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:11:12 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B258B9EF-8B78-4B44-AB74-4AB7A36E60A9@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
References: <0636D1EB-942D-4416-858E-E698863B141C@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
To: Benjamin Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailcore-Auth: 9600544
X-Mailcore-Domain: 172912
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, L3VPN WG mailing list <l3vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Joint L3VPN & OSPF WG LC for draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:11:14 -0000

L3VPNers & OSPFers,

This joint WG LC has now ended. One person commented on the L3VPN mailing list:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/current/msg02903.html

Can the authors continue to work to resolve the comments and produce an updated draft.

Thanks
Ben
 
On 16 Mar 2011, at 07:44, Benjamin Niven-Jenkins wrote:

> L3VPNers & OSPFers,
> 
> You may recall that back in January 2010 we pulled draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-04 out of the RFC Editor's queue because we had forgotten to solicit a review from the OSPF WG. See http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/current/msg05658.htm for more info on that.
> 
> The OSPF WG raised some comments on the draft, which has gone through a few revisions and draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07 is thought to address all the previous comments raised.
> 
> This e-mail is therefore the start of a joint L3VPN & OSPF WG Last Call for the updated draft. It is restricted to changes made since the last review (i.e. changes between -04 and -07).
> 
> Due to the proximity of IETF80 we are allowing 4 weeks for the LC. Please provide any further comments on the changes by midnight PDT on the 13th April 2011.
> 
> You can view -07 of the draft here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07.txt
> 
> You can view a diff between -04 and -07 here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-04&url2=draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospfv3-pece-07
> 
> Thanks
> Ben (on behalf of the L3VPN & OSPF chairs)
>