Fwd: [OSPF] SPF calculation in OSPF
"Santosh Esale" <s.esale@gmail.com> Wed, 30 August 2006 09:50 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIMiH-0001WK-NI; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:50:25 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIMiG-0001W9-Fp for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:50:24 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIMiG-0003To-BP for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:50:24 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.230]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIMaK-0000Ry-4d for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:42:13 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t4so151877wxc for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=i9+spTTR9+UYOxBIVqKXuSD1RtfwdsMit/ssVDsUtDoziXUOIvG5rj6CdtQx69P/P2lSDkxVi9N2JtoQHiatx8ydM0qFx4WbiSR22gdptqLrUQDUsc/d4rp8c//AfMdfcetIghxjDhkjhtg1RvFB9z3z2xncO2tkL1OmvBnJ/O0=
Received: by 10.70.70.14 with SMTP id s14mr337110wxa; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.40.8 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <c4bf85a20608300242wcb27aa6la8f99a853559184f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:12:10 +0530
From: Santosh Esale <s.esale@gmail.com>
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Fwd: [OSPF] SPF calculation in OSPF
In-Reply-To: <c4bf85a20608292257p43fc1458t56456b7143522102@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4fbcb25a0608292227s7409731dm1377d857c1afd383@mail.gmail.com> <c4bf85a20608292257p43fc1458t56456b7143522102@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1252063131=="
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Santosh Esale <s.esale@gmail.com> Date: Aug 30, 2006 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [OSPF] SPF calculation in OSPF To: Navina Balan <navinab@gmail.com> Full spf calclualtion need to run again if there is any change in the topology of area. If neighbour changes from Full to any of the lower state or lower state to full state , Router LSA will be regenerated again for this as well the neighbouring router and DR will regenerate network lsa(in case of boradcast link) which will result in topology change. If summary or external LSAs are withdrawn or added, most of the implementation runs incremental SPF. Thanks Santosh On 8/30/06, Navina Balan <navinab@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, I have a doubt in OSPF. Can you let me know, if Nbr Change occurs, do SPF calculation needs to done again. TIA Swapna _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] SPF calculation in OSPF Navina Balan
- RE: [OSPF] SPF calculation in OSPF sujay
- Fwd: [OSPF] SPF calculation in OSPF Santosh Esale