Re: 2 ospf link on the same physical link
Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Thu, 08 August 2002 01:31 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA16064 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:31:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <4.006C447F@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:32:42 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 77117 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:32:37 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:32:37 -0400
Received: from redback.com (login001.redback.com [155.53.12.18]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E55F428F29 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <200208071233.g77CXru02107@euripides.eth.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3D51CA86.2090203@redback.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 21:33:58 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: 2 ospf link on the same physical link
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sandor, Some vendors support OSPF on secondary IP addresses and others do not. Refer to the list post below. http://discuss.microsoft.com/SCRIPTS/WA-MSD.EXE?A2=ind0203&L=ospf&T=0&F=&S=&P=3918 The draft below proposes a way of supporting a single link in multiple areas as a way of getting around the primary address limitation (among other benefits). http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-mlinks-03.txt Thanks, Acee Sandor Ecker wrote: > Hello! > > I have tried the following on zebra (redhat linux), and on cisco routers too. > I had a simple ip link (for example r1_e0/1--r2_e0/1), i added a network entry > to the ospf, to bring the adj. up, this was ok. I added a secondary ip address > (in another subnet) to the interfaces in every router, and the corresponding > network entry for the ospf. But the second ospf link didn't grow up... :( > > I made a topology like this: > > +---+ +---+ > | |e0/1 e0/1| | > | |----Ar0----| | > | | | | > | r1|sec sec| r2| > | |----Ar1----| | > | | | | > +---+ +---+ > > r1: > The interface config: > ! > interface Ethernet0/1 > ip address 10.211.92.1 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 10.211.192.1 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip ospf network point-to-point > > The ospf config: > router ospf 1 > network 10.211.92.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 > network 10.211.192.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > ! > > On this router the ospf showed just the original interface with the original ip > address... > > r1#show ip ospf interface > Ethernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up > Internet Address 10.211.192.1/24, Area 0 > Process ID 1, Router ID 10.211.192.1, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost: 10 > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT, > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 > Hello due in 00:00:00 > Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) > Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 2 > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec > Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 > Adjacent with neighbor 10.211.192.8 > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) > > > r2: > Interface config: > ! > interface Ethernet0/1 > ip address 10.211.92.8 255.255.255.0 secondary > ip address 10.211.192.8 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > ip ospf network point-to-point > > The ospf config: > router ospf 1 > network 10.211.92.0 0.0.0.255 area 1 > network 10.211.192.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 > ! > > On this router like the first, just the original ip address occur. > > r2#show ip ospf interface > Ethernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up > Internet Address 10.211.192.8/24, Area 0 > Process ID 1, Router ID 10.211.192.8, Network Type POINT_TO_POINT, Cost: 10 > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT, > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 > Hello due in 00:00:03 > Index 1/1, flood queue length 0 > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0) > Last flood scan length is 1, maximum is 1 > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec > Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 > Adjacent with neighbor 10.211.192.1 > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) > > Kozos volt a kovetkezo: > > The adj. was the same on each router. > > r1#show ip ospf neighbor > > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface > 10.211.192.8 1 FULL/ - 00:00:32 10.211.192.8 Ethernet0/1 > > The secondary ip address work, i can ping it. (for ex.: from r1 10.211.92.8) > > The experience with zebras was the same. They haven't seen the eth2:0 as ospf > interface. > show ip ospf interface shows nothing about eth2:0. > > Hello packets were send just between the primary interfaces, so neighboring grow > up just between them. > > Has anybody any idea, experience? Thanks a lot! > > Sincerely, > Sandor Ecker > > -- Acee
- 2 ospf link on the same physical link Sandor Ecker
- Re: 2 ospf link on the same physical link Acee Lindem