Re: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst

Dean cheng <dean.cheng@huawei.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.cheng@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B890821F86E2 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YT6RpBwpl08N for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E7221F85E4 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AHW23799; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:12:31 -0700
Received: from SZXEML423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.162) by dfweml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:12:29 -0700
Received: from SZXEML523-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.147]) by szxeml423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.162]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 23:12:23 +0800
From: Dean cheng <dean.cheng@huawei.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst
Thread-Index: Ac1WPhHoKi/atuSpQeyIAmKxUfNNkwDIkKzwASEXp8A=
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:12:22 +0000
Message-ID: <DC7880973D477648AC15A3BA66253F6851A3E32D@szxeml523-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.244.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DC7880973D477648AC15A3BA66253F6851A3E32Dszxeml523mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:14:01 -0000

We've received some comments and plan to post a new revision
before 7/16 (the deadline). Please take a look of this draft and
send us comments much appreciated.

Cheers
Dean

________________________________
From: Dean cheng
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 2:16 PM
To: 'Acee Lindem'; OSPF List
Subject: RE: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst


We've made some editorial improvements and just posted

as a -03 revision.



http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03



Comments welcome.



Cheers

Dean



> -----Original Message-----

> From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

> Acee Lindem

> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:28 PM

> To: OSPF List

> Subject: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-ietf-ospf-

> ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-02.tst

>

>

> Speaking as WG Co-Chair,

>

> I'd like to WG last call this prior to Vancouver to volunteer to review

> it? There hasn't been a lot of discussion after we concluded that the

> translation was aligned with work in the BEHAVE WG.

> Please take a look and post comments. It is not that long a draft by may

> require you to at least scan RFC 6052.

>

> Thanks,

> Acee