Re: OSPF-V3 Instance ID

Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Fri, 09 July 2004 03:15 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA12283 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.00E0C9A1@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:15:21 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 25118986 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:15:19 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 23:15:19 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9EA908167 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26481-02 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aceeinspiron (unknown [172.31.253.53]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 29E9B908165 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
References: <c03d304704070819373ae63d02@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Message-ID: <091801c46562$ec4f0ae0$0202a8c0@aceeinspiron>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 23:15:01 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: OSPF-V3 Instance ID
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Dilip,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dilip Kumar" <dilipks@GMAIL.COM>
To: <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:37 PM
Subject: OSPF-V3 Instance ID


> Hello,
>     I have couple of doubts w.r.to OSPF-V3's Instance ID interpretation
> 1. Can one router interface have more than one "Instance ID"
> configured simultaneously ?

Yes.  However,  there may be implementations that only support one to
be configured.

> OSPF-V3 MIB draft (draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-mib-08) indicates that it is
> not possible.

This is wrong. ospfv3IfTable should be indexed by both ospfv3IfIndex
and ospfv3InstId.


> However, RFC-2740 indirectly points that it is possible.
> Following is the excerpt from the RFC-2740
>
>   "Another use for running multiple OSPF instances is if you want, for
>    one reason or another, to have a single link belong to two or more
>    OSPF areas."

This is one application of multiple instance IDs.

>
> 2. Can LSAs received from a neighbor 'A' which has instance ID=2 be
> flooded to another neighbor B that has instance ID=5 ?
>
>        InstanceID=2                  InstanceID=5
> A=================R================B

The base OSPFv3 specification (RFC 2740) certainly doesn't preclude this
since the interface instance ID only has significance for that interface.
In case of draft-mirtorabi-ospf-multi-area-adj-00.txt, the instance ID has
significance beyond the scope of the interface and you would not.

Hope this helps,
Acee

>
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
> -- Dilip