Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes from IETF 95

prz <prz@zeta2.ch> Mon, 11 April 2016 12:13 UTC

Return-Path: <prz@zeta2.ch>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9B712ED48 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DxETdLazgQu9 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeta2.ch (zux172-086.adsl.green.ch [80.254.172.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F164B12ED49 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.zeta2.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: prz) by zeta2.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 681631FB3D; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:13:36 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 05:13:36 -0700
From: prz <prz@zeta2.ch>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D330445B.58C7B%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D330445B.58C7B%acee@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <04479c8fba16697eb3a51ea89d0cd708@zeta2.ch>
X-Sender: prz@zeta2.ch
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.4.2
X-MailScanner-ID: 681631FB3D.AF086
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
X-MailScanner-From: prz@zeta2.ch
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/ROczU7eMgW43CarkVNl4s1TlQ40>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes from IETF 95
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:13:49 -0000

 On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 21:56:46 +0000, "Acee Lindem (acee)" 
 <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> The minutes for are posted here:
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/minutes/minutes-95-ospf
>
> Thanks to Les Ginsberg from Cisco for taking them.
>
> Note that there were two names that we were not sure of and they are
> preceded with “(???)”. Please E-mail me if you know either of these 
> full
> names and I will update the minutes.
>

 hmm, reading minutes & grinning, wasn't that you that chided me on the 
 mike 2-3 IETFs ago
 with "by now since 10 years e'one got the max-link-metric stuff right" 
 ;-)

 Agree on the comment with the bandwidth encoding. No need to invent 
 another one.

 --- tony