Re: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-cheng-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03.txt

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 25 March 2011 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01453A6838 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_BACKHAIR_44=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHUmOjSse1A9 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1C13A682D for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 12:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=aretana@cisco.com; l=8537; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1301082947; x=1302292547; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:from:to; bh=8ZLI47AghgT3SeT8Hi3cPvS5cV8GU8FNcaduBfWuWno=; b=Ygee1T+z+th4FOdeYIigOR7lYydKy2t6vNHYEdVu4o12Eq9lLNrI4y0g FMHwV42Xl/Tx2izaz7xAT7nyggl+iNpZIoMMOKf4FY9Z2pHEDSmlaAsFr 6KfOrKd8fH1V0tHC9tkCzbiU7Uu5QzlC35NzKEqr000RcknKr3/ot6wcL U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEBAAXzjE2tJXG8/2dsb2JhbACCYZVDjT93p1qcQ4VpBIU6ixU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.63,244,1299456000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="281390892"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2011 19:55:45 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2PJtjgj029010; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:55:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-206.cisco.com ([72.163.62.213]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:55:45 -0500
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBEB26.A1023139"
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:55:38 -0500
Message-ID: <1D23749D4168CC4D8B8652397B5F643204DA67E9@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B62F3183-F09F-4200-A3A8-8BCE08F42694@ericsson.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-cheng-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03.txt
Thread-Index: AcvqX2te7VKAvQeZSkq1b6jNDq9x2wAxynGQ
References: <B62F3183-F09F-4200-A3A8-8BCE08F42694@ericsson.com>
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>, ospf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2011 19:55:45.0524 (UTC) FILETIME=[A1282B40:01CBEB26]
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets - draft-cheng-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:54:12 -0000

Support.

 

Alvaro.

 

From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Acee Lindem
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:10 PM
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Routing for IPv4-embedded IPv6 Packets -
draft-cheng-ospf-ipv4-embedded-ipv6-routing-03.txt

 

This draft was presented in Beijing. Since that time, we've had numerous
discussions with the BEHAVE WG chairs and they would support this work.
RFC 6052 describes the IPv4<->IPv6 translation and this draft proposes
using RFC 5838 (Support of Address Families in OSPFv3) to advertise
translated IPv4 prefixes from isolated IPv4 routing domains. The
intended status is informational. Please indicate whether or not you
support this becoming an OSPF WG draft.

Thanks,

Acee