IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Topology Transparent Zone"

Boris Zhang <Boris.Zhang@telus.com> Fri, 22 January 2016 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Boris.Zhang@telus.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61121A6EFC; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:11:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShMYrLr6MdyS; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from donder.nssi.telus.com (donder.nssi.telus.com [208.38.59.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A911ACEB0; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:11:35 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: s=donder.nssi; d=telus.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:X-IronPort-AV:Received: Received:From:To:Date:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version; b=idjjLe7c9HSsGPxDeIb4L7ROJpwvudWxXelzt4BBTuKRo6OFYSRIgokf jz4f1rf2LhfJY36SeF4Dq27VsVWHQ+O0/LyGAom5tkqkWgYywTaXq87vj 9boqxHDYgpSkKJUTvZFZGpt79L2NLy2/S9q/J9hSbms95MgrZAmrA1+xp I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2D/AQAaRqJW/2qAP45egw8rUm2IV5sjlmMBDYFiGAqFbQIcgR84FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRBAQEBBAEBARoGER8bFwQCAQgNAQMEAQEDAiMDAgICJQsUAQgIAgQBEgiIEwEECa8OjzkBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERBHuFN4RthEsWgmsrgQ8Fjh6IWIVGiW6HX4U8imyDUx4BAUKEBEyHIwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,331,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="480760159"
Received: from unknown (HELO WP40058.corp.ads) ([142.63.128.106]) by donder-o.nssi.telus.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 22 Jan 2016 15:11:33 +0000
Received: from wp40067.corp.ads ([::1]) by WP40058.corp.ads ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:11:32 -0500
From: Boris Zhang <Boris.Zhang@telus.com>
To: Richard Li <renwei.li@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 10:11:30 -0500
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Topology Transparent Zone"
Thread-Index: AQHRUWX4WUgdvYJt+U2CntPAj+O4a58FX3YAgAJKY+A=
Message-ID: <3CC752382EB88F48ADAC4AF9F478A15317CEF8C108@WP40067.corp.ads>
References: <D2C1642E.4A075%acee@cisco.com> <F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C390BEE2C@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F061CEB6876F904F8EA6D6B92877731C390BEE2C@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-CA
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-CA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Y2BYUGr6Ijs64XUTf3tgjYla-JM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Topology Transparent Zone"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:11:42 -0000

Support. 

As OSPF supports broadcast domain and mobility LTE standard requests S1 to X2 handover, that makes many wireless SPs choose OSPF to build back haul network. Given the size of back haul network, any advanced technology help to scale up the deployment are welcome.

Boris Zhang


-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Li
Sent: January 20, 2016 11:13 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Topology Transparent Zone"

I support it as a co-author. It allows us to turn network zones into virtual entities and thus increases the network scalability. The implementation of this method in our operating system has shown that it works great, especially for those very complex network topologies.

Thanks,

Renwei

-----Original Message-----
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2016 8:31 PM
To: OSPF WG List; draft-ietf-ospf-ttz@ietf.org
Cc: Padmadevi Pillay Esnault
Subject: Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Topology Transparent Zone" 

This is the start of the WG last call for the “OSPF Topology Transparent Zone” protocol extensions draft. We’ve had a number of discussions on this and Huawei has a prototype implementation. The WG last call will end at
12:00 AM PDT on February 1st, 2016. For your convenience, here is a URL:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ttz/

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay 

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email