Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF version 3 - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-10.txt

Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com> Thu, 17 April 2008 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ospf-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ospf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A7728C580; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C2328C25D for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.488, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zn73b7pPlCki for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com (prattle.redback.com [155.53.12.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C3B28C592 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE506AE1E0; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10064-04; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5&???g??p??`???$IPv6???1] (login005.redback.com [155.53.12.64]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606026AE1DE; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A09921AC-BB2D-4450-8476-7CE0C2F24149@redback.com>
References: <A09921AC-BB2D-4450-8476-7CE0C2F24149@redback.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753)
Message-Id: <55FAFC06-9634-46AD-AD78-E0CF6CF2A6B8@redback.com>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:13:19 -0400
To: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Cc: Vishwas Manral <vishwas@ipinfusion.com>, Alan Davey <alan.davey@dataconnection.com>, CCAMP List <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for Traffic Engineering Extensions to OSPF version 3 - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-10.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

The WG last call has completed and I've posted a new version  
incorporating Adrian's comments. We'll move on to AD review with this  
draft.
Thanks,
Acee
On Mar 31, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> We've WG last called this draft in the past and we're going to do  
> it again now. After some deliberations we've made the decision to  
> go forward with this document with the two existing implementations  
> and forgo the request for interoperability testing. The WG last  
> call will be begin today and end April 15, 2008 at 12:00 AM EDT.
> Thanks,
> Acee

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf