Re: [OSPF] Anycast Extension to OSPFv3 draft-wang-aospf-00

"Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 13 December 2006 02:55 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuKGx-0007vV-Nq; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:55:07 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuKGv-0007vA-V7 for OSPF@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:55:05 -0500
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GuKFx-0008DL-K5 for OSPF@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:54:07 -0500
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h27so39566wxd for <OSPF@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:54:05 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LJH1r5WKvLaGnWn3ps/jLfh3JLhyXA3+W3BWPFUZV7/8DmN8abovaMyFS4C7vilt+eKaJ3mMYl+aBvCYLGtz6x/jkwSCV+hoAJa8205d2gFTdIf/5q7MWtu7Uc6cMF5Tcv1Kox87BNbCbHVOOrTZIrfvO1GoLXUxZNPUTluUrcE=
Received: by 10.90.80.8 with SMTP id d8mr196878agb.1165978445260; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.71.7 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <77ead0ec0612121854m22dde646s9926ceae66b936c0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:54:05 -0800
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Anycast Extension to OSPFv3 draft-wang-aospf-00
In-Reply-To: <457F67F1.3080009@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <22b5a47b0612010106i477c1814p982523d5bacd4698@mail.gmail.com> <457F2DE4.7060009@cisco.com> <457F300E.6030009@cisco.com> <457F631C.8080809@acm.org> <457F67F1.3080009@cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b7b9551d71acde901886cc48bfc088a6
Cc: OSPF@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Abhay,

I agree with the analysis on Acee and Russ on the draft. I have myself
not read the draft yet though.

On another front I must state that Acee has been trying to help and
promote new people in the working group and I have seen that happen
explicitly in some cases and would want to vouch for that.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On 12/12/06, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> Abhay,
>
> Abhay D.S wrote:
> > hi acee,
> > Not very positive and encouraging, being on a WG chair.
> I clearly stated I was speaking a WG member and have just
> as much right as anyone else to state my opinion as to whether or
> not a specific piece of work is accepted by the WG. If you have
> technical comments related to the draft as opposed to critiques of
> character, I'd encourage you to share them.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> > It reminds me of  folks at the ATM forum in the past !!
> > Thanks,
> > Abhay
> >
> >
> >
> > Acee Lindem wrote:
> >> Speaking as a WG Member and author of the RFC 2740 respin:
> >>
> >> My opinion is that the protocol extensions described in the draft
> >> are completely unnecessary and the OSPFv3 (RFC 2740 and its
> >> update) already can support anycast addresses as /128 prefixes.
> >> One simply uses the lowest cost path. Note that the protocol
> >> already support configuration of host routes as described in appendix
> >> C.7.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Acee
> >>
> >> Acee Lindem wrote:
> >>> Speaking as WG Chair:
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to initiate discussion on this draft so that we can let the
> >>> authors
> >>> know whether the WG wants to presue it furthers.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Acee
> >>>
> >>> Yue Wang wrote:
> >>>> This document describes AOSPF (Anycast Extensions to OSPFv3),
> >>>>   a routing protocol which extends OSPFv3 to support anycast, which
> >>>>   we implemented and tested successfully in our IPv6 test bed. And
> >>>>   the performance analysis shows the overhead of AOSPF is low.
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-aospf-00.txt
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OSPF mailing list
> >>> OSPF@ietf.org
> >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OSPF mailing list
> >> OSPF@ietf.org
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf