Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt
"Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@CISCO.COM> Tue, 20 January 2004 12:56 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA26963 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:56:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.00CACDC9@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 7:56:16 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 68774471 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:56:14 -0500
Received: from 144.254.74.5 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:46:14 -0500
Received: from cisco.com (144.254.74.60) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2004 13:46:57 +0100
Received: from xbe-lon-302.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ams-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0KCjpB9005896; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:45:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: from xbe-lon-313.cisco.com ([64.103.99.73]) by xbe-lon-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:46:11 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Topic: RE: Last Call for draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt
Thread-Index: AcPfU1MQ3Nzt9PdCT9KXxXv+uleoJw==
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2004 12:46:11.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[62342510:01C3DF53]
Message-ID: <AC60B39EEE7320498063D37799FB82D9022B4F91@xbe-lon-313.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:46:10 -0000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt
Comments: cc: Ed Kern <ejk@tech.org>, Jim Boyle <jboyle@pdnets.com>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello, This is just an FYI. Last October, a Last Call was sent to TEWG, MPLS, ISIS and OSPF on <draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05>. The document was then progressed to IESG Review. As part of the IESG Review, it was pointed out that the description of "Bandwidth Constraints" sub-TLV (within the "Link TLV" of the Traffic Engineering LSA) did not properly reflect the ususal 32-bit alignment. Accordingly, the description of the sub-TLV has been updated to explicitely include a "Reserved" field for 32-bit alignment. The updated description can be found in the latest version of the document i.e. <draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-06> which addresses all the IESG Review comments (just posted so it may take a day or so before it is visible on the IETF server). Cheers Francois >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ed Kern [mailto:ejk@tech.org] >> Sent: vendredi 3 octobre 2003 21:10 >> To: mpls@UU.NET >> Subject: Last Call for draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt >> and friends >> >> >> >> ##Note: This last call is being sent to te-wg,ISIS,OSPF,MPLS >> in separate >> emails to trim silly "respond-all" people and aggressive >> junk filters. >> >> This will serve as a last call for the standards track document >> >> draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.txt >> >> available at >> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-05.tx t> and the "friends" (accompanying bandwidth control drafts) going towards experimental: draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-04.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-04. txt> draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mar-02.txt> draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-01.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-mam-01.txt> This last call will be three weeks ending 10/24/03 after which time many beers will be consumed. All comments about the drafts should be to/on the te-wg@ops.ietf.org list. All flames about duplicates of this message to me. thx Ed
- Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-0… Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)