Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 11 October 2007 16:08 UTC
Return-path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig0aU-0003du-6H; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:08:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig0aR-0003Th-JW; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:08:35 -0400
Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.142]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig0aQ-0000G5-9G; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:08:35 -0400
Received: from [88.96.235.138] (helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ig0aP-0004YC-Jq; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:08:33 +0000
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([81.140.15.32] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:08:33 +0100
Message-ID: <0c9901c80c20$f621dbc0$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: l1vpn@ietf.org
References: <02e801c8013c$9df58d00$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe> <470E3E35.7060400@cisco.com> <200710111539.l9BFdWX2019051@mta3.iomartmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:08:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2007 16:08:33.0303 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8D19270:01C80C20]
X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [88.96.235.138]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1676547e4f33b5e63227e9c02bd359e3
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Anton, Last call deadline is only the deadline. Your comments are well within. Yes, as Lou says, I noted that the L should apply only to the V for harmony with OSPF. I completely missed the LTV/TLV thing. Good catch! Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> To: "Anton Smirnov" <asmirnov@cisco.com> Cc: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <ospf@ietf.org>; <l1vpn@ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:39 PM Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls > Anton, > I believe someone else made a similar comment (perhaps Adrian?). > I agree that the T&L definition should be aligned with the common T&L > definition. (i.e., Type then length & length only covers size of V.) > > Lou > > At 11:16 AM 10/11/2007, Anton Smirnov wrote: > >> Hi Adrian, all, >> I know it is damn close to last call deadline but I wanted to question >> format of data propagated via OSPF in >> >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-03.txt >> >>Format of TLVs propagated via L1VPN LSA proposed as: >> >>----- >>3.2. L1VPN INFO TLV >> >> The following TLV is introduced: >> >> Name: L1VPN IPv4 Info >> Type: 1 >> Length: Variable >> >> 0 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | L1VPN TLV length | L1VPN TLV Type | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >>... >> >> TLV length >> The length of the TLV in bytes, including the 4 bytes of >> the TLV header. >>----- >> >>So here length comes before TLV type (so strictly speaking it should be >>called LTV throughout the document) and length includes TLV header. >>Just about every TLV so far standardized to be propagated via OSPF has >>Type field coming first and length covering only value field (see TLV >>definitions in TE, GR, RCAP, LLS, tags and whatsnot). Wouldn't it be >>prudent to avoid divergence and make implementator's life slightly easier >>to follow the suit? OSPF is used here merely as a transport protocol for >>L1VPN discovery values so it is better if definition of service fields is >>more friendly toward existing OSPF practices. >> >> Thanks, >> >>Anton >> >> >> >>Adrian Farrel wrote: >>>Hi OSPF working group, >>>The L1VPN working group is holding a last call on several drafts. One of >>>them uses OSPF to advertise L1VPN membership. >>>This I-D has previously been presented to the OSPF working group and some >>>feedback has been incorporated. We would welcome any further thoughts >>>during the last call. By preference, please send comments to the L1VPN >>>list, but anything sent to the OSPF list will be forwarded. >>>Thanks, >>>Adrian >>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> >>>To: <l1vpn@ietf.org> >>>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:17 PM >>>Subject: [L1vpn] Four working group last calls >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>Now that there is a bit of peace and quiet on the CCAMP last calls, we >>>>would like to hold L1VPN last calls on four I-Ds: >>>> >>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-02.txt >>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-02.txt >>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-02.txt >>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-03.txt >>>> >>>>Since there are four drafts, we will make this a three week last call. >>>>It will complete at 12 noon GMT on 18th October 2007. >>>> >>>>We will be notifying the IDR, OSPF, and CCAMP working groups about this >>>>last call. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Adrian, Hamid, and Tomonori >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>OSPF mailing list >>>OSPF@ietf.org >>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >>_______________________________________________ >>OSPF mailing list >>OSPF@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >> >> > > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls Adrian Farrel
- Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls Anton Smirnov
- Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls Lou Berger
- Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls Adrian Farrel