Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 11 October 2007 16:08 UTC

Return-path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig0aU-0003du-6H; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:08:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig0aR-0003Th-JW; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:08:35 -0400
Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.142]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ig0aQ-0000G5-9G; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:08:35 -0400
Received: from [88.96.235.138] (helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ig0aP-0004YC-Jq; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:08:33 +0000
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([81.140.15.32] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:08:33 +0100
Message-ID: <0c9901c80c20$f621dbc0$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: l1vpn@ietf.org
References: <02e801c8013c$9df58d00$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe> <470E3E35.7060400@cisco.com> <200710111539.l9BFdWX2019051@mta3.iomartmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:08:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2007 16:08:33.0303 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8D19270:01C80C20]
X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [88.96.235.138]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1676547e4f33b5e63227e9c02bd359e3
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Anton,

Last call deadline is only the deadline. Your comments are well within.

Yes, as Lou says, I noted that the L should apply only to the V for harmony 
with OSPF.
I completely missed the LTV/TLV thing. Good catch!

Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net>
To: "Anton Smirnov" <asmirnov@cisco.com>
Cc: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; <ospf@ietf.org>; <l1vpn@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Fw: Four L1VPN working group last calls


> Anton,
>         I believe someone else made a similar comment (perhaps Adrian?). 
> I agree that the T&L definition should be aligned with the common T&L 
> definition. (i.e., Type then length & length only covers size of V.)
>
> Lou
>
> At 11:16 AM 10/11/2007, Anton Smirnov wrote:
>
>>    Hi Adrian, all,
>>    I know it is damn close to last call deadline but I wanted to question 
>> format of data propagated via OSPF in
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-03.txt
>>
>>Format of TLVs propagated via L1VPN LSA proposed as:
>>
>>-----
>>3.2. L1VPN INFO TLV
>>
>>    The following TLV is introduced:
>>
>>    Name: L1VPN IPv4 Info
>>    Type: 1
>>    Length: Variable
>>
>>     0                   1                   2                   3
>>     0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>    |         L1VPN TLV length      |           L1VPN TLV Type      |
>>    +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>>...
>>
>>    TLV length
>>       The length of the TLV in bytes, including the 4 bytes of
>>       the TLV header.
>>-----
>>
>>So here length comes before TLV type (so strictly speaking it should be 
>>called LTV throughout the document) and length includes TLV header.
>>Just about every TLV so far standardized to be propagated via OSPF has 
>>Type field coming first and length covering only value field (see TLV 
>>definitions in TE, GR, RCAP, LLS, tags and whatsnot). Wouldn't it be 
>>prudent to avoid divergence and make implementator's life slightly easier 
>>to follow the suit? OSPF is used here merely as a transport protocol for 
>>L1VPN discovery values so it is better if definition of service fields is 
>>more friendly toward existing OSPF practices.
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>
>>Anton
>>
>>
>>
>>Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>>Hi OSPF working group,
>>>The L1VPN working group is holding a last call on several drafts. One of 
>>>them uses OSPF to advertise L1VPN membership.
>>>This I-D has previously been presented to the OSPF working group and some 
>>>feedback has been incorporated. We would welcome any further thoughts 
>>>during the last call. By preference, please send comments to the L1VPN 
>>>list, but anything sent to the OSPF list will be forwarded.
>>>Thanks,
>>>Adrian
>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
>>>To: <l1vpn@ietf.org>
>>>Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 8:17 PM
>>>Subject: [L1vpn] Four working group last calls
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Now that there is a bit of peace and quiet on the CCAMP last calls, we 
>>>>would like to hold L1VPN last calls on four I-Ds:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-02.txt
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-02.txt
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-02.txt
>>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-03.txt
>>>>
>>>>Since there are four drafts, we will make this a three week last call. 
>>>>It will complete at 12 noon GMT on 18th October 2007.
>>>>
>>>>We will be notifying the IDR, OSPF, and CCAMP working groups about this 
>>>>last call.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Adrian, Hamid, and Tomonori
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OSPF mailing list
>>>OSPF@ietf.org
>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OSPF mailing list
>>OSPF@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>>
>
> 



_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf