[OSPF] WG Last Call Completed - OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 22 October 2015 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F1C1B423E for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id anJIr1ji5Hjr for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5FAD1B423D for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=240; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445549048; x=1446758648; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=XZPDLRKRsfnLglVk40iZgK51EgCExgjEJ5WKCKErhXM=; b=GDLSUR3/K9p0G7KoYky70mu6JqECZxnl1/VdBJVoOhEnJNpsOAjp8Ok3 EQlsfsbVWHf/R8NFEzo5HdP4agPgxnY5/HFxAyF7eVf2rmdBcAvS2/TjT SWaaFYzi86osRlzY8o9ILU4+xjAyJHXcjzxGAV2XV+q9bTUmKXC7iL990 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D0AQCvUilW/5xdJa1egzaBSbl8hCEBDYFZhjuBMDgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDUjEVcBIgImAgQwFRIEiEOiZo9xkm4BAQgCASCBIpJQgUUFlisBjR2cJQEfAQFCgkSBP4YvgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,184,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="38226737"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2015 21:24:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9MLO89A024567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:24:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com (173.37.102.25) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:23:48 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) by XCH-RCD-015.cisco.com ([173.37.102.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:23:47 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call Completed - OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator
Thread-Index: AQHRDQ/wzncdLCzVkUSoquTPoCjKcQ==
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:23:47 +0000
Message-ID: <D24ECC34.38065%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.199]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B066F41ED4DD3241A36AFFC9BB0E63C9@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/lHjxyNxns3jeJMH37p1HhnRboNg>
Subject: [OSPF] WG Last Call Completed - OSPF extensions to advertise S-BFD Target Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:24:10 -0000

The WG last call has completed and the comment was addressed in the -02
version. I will initiate an IPR Poll and, subsequently, request
publication. 

Thanks,
Acee