Re: stub area in a vrf
Robert Pineau <rpineau@NORTELNETWORKS.COM> Thu, 29 July 2004 13:46 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA11200 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:46:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <4.00E2D8FF@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 9:46:15 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 28133628 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:46:14 -0400
Received: from 47.140.192.55 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:14 -0400
Received: from zrtpd0jn.us.nortel.com (zrtpd0jn.us.nortel.com [47.140.202.35]) by zrtps0kn.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i6TDaCm23756 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by zrtpd0jn.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <MXHTHPQX>; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:36:12 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C47570.F743E757"
Message-ID: <085091CB2CA14E4B8B163FFC37C84E9DBC08BA@zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:35:44 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Robert Pineau <rpineau@NORTELNETWORKS.COM>
Subject: Re: stub area in a vrf
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Hi John, Mani, What if the VRF was an ABR, and simply supplied a default route to the CE in the stub? I think this should work and allow the PE-CE link be part of a stub area. Thanks, Rob. -----Original Message----- From: Mani Devarajan [mailto:mani_devarajan@NET.COM] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:56 PM To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM Subject: Re: stub area in a vrf Hi Jonh, I tried to do similar kind of testing, that is configuring PE-CE link as stub. But as PE will be ASBR, we cannot configure it in a stub. rfc 2328: Section 3.6 AS boundary routers cannot be placed internal to stub areas. Thanks, Mani Acee Lindem wrote: >Hi John, > >Note that this draft (draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospf-2547-01.txt) is a product >of the L3VPN WG and not the OSPF WG. Perhaps Eric or Padma could >respond. Although I know how I would handle it I don't think the stub >area case is covered in the draft. > >Thanks, >Acee > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "John Pecola" <john_pecola@YAHOO.COM> >To: <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM> >Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:52 PM >Subject: stub area in a vrf > > > > >>Hi, >> >>With the 2547 VPNs, a CE router may receive type 3 >>LSAs from a PE for redistributed routes. Assuming that >>2547 BGP routes are redistributd into ospf on the PE >>in the vrf (ASBR), can there be a scenario where it is desired to >>configure the PE-CE link as part of a stub area? Should it be even >>allowed? >> >>Thanks >>John >> >> >> >>__________________________________ >>Do you Yahoo!? >>Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! >>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >> >>
- stub area in a vrf John Pecola
- Re: stub area in a vrf Acee Lindem
- Re: stub area in a vrf Mani Devarajan
- Re: stub area in a vrf Robert Pineau
- Re: stub area in a vrf Acee Lindem
- Re: stub area in a vrf Mani Devarajan
- Re: stub area in a vrf John Pecola