Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 26 July 2016 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D758C12D67E for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:22:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t_DX-UOjR_UZ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB32E12D678 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1524; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1469532164; x=1470741764; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Qaq+BuY39W/KV3fCUa0jhBpcDE0y0WY94MkYKrKdXUY=; b=MF/nSEN9nnPECm33ejyxn3vW0IzsYQ+NchNp7gQuv44XZ+VL97AHi8nq 9XzMLMOFN75AekTmy+nu07LfXZKmnqr99Xcc5CtfL3nPV5GOU2qAdecg7 x2/CnmeDPmpjeXz6+J0XnuVXBvaaKghXmdZHhbvlCRZVed0vg4BnmoDc8 E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CrAwDQRZdX/4QNJK1egz9WfAa4dIF9J?= =?us-ascii?q?IV5AhyBGTgUAQEBAQEBAV0nhFwBAQUBASEROhcEAgEIEQQBAQMCIwMCAgIlCxQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BCAgCBAESiDEOqQyNXAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFgQGJdoRAF4Jqg?= =?us-ascii?q?loFmTEBjnqBbIRaiHmMLYN3AR42g3huh0N/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,424,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="130185848"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Jul 2016 11:22:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u6QBMgGJ016078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:22:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:22:42 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 07:22:42 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes
Thread-Index: AQHR5v2TXdNv0B710UuFnCmArnbrTqAqkhCA
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:22:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D3BCBF6F.70ABF%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D3BBEA78.706FF%acee@cisco.com> <CY1PR05MB2714851B3D7957A16F52DB68D50E0@CY1PR05MB2714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR05MB2714851B3D7957A16F52DB68D50E0@CY1PR05MB2714.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <36D6865BB993EB4A81A830D4B4F4686C@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/mckmTpeP3vFXhAxzfGxKOWmV7Yk>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:22:53 -0000

Hi Shraddha, 
Thanks for the correction. I have uploaded the updated minutes.
Thanks,
Acee 

On 7/26/16, 1:21 AM, "Shraddha Hegde" <shraddha@juniper.net> wrote:

>
>I guess the below statement needs correction
>
>Abhay Roy: MRT draft has normative reference on link overload LSA
>    which is stuck at the moment.
>
>Should be
>
>Abhay Roy: MRT draft has normative reference on  "ospfv3 extended LSA"
>    which is stuck at the moment.
>
>Abhay, can you confirm?
>
>Rgds
>Shraddha
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
>Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 10:11 PM
>To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
>Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG Minutes
>
>Note that the OSPF WG minutes for IETF 96 have been posted. Please
>unicast me with any additions or correction.
>
>https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-ospf
>
>Thanks to Les Ginsberg for taking the minutes.
>
>Thanks,
>Acee 
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf