Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 15 November 2016 09:21 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE36E129A30; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:21:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h50OSr3Mqu3k; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:21:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C971296CD; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:21:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5123; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1479201669; x=1480411269; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=uJeX5iJFpYWsOsYpLK3/XKmxBCxvdMwMc54tOIYD8wg=; b=g1gm0VIPC442FoWTd69LLTra8IOdDWseDImx9dJu0lCnGw/TZJVyUcfG hF5sI/s21J2ClS2CeimOtSFqO4SzbFtUgwVc9SJ79glj0DEeUoUHOArHU 5T89k2nHRFqBSRTDLNnLgnua53o2Ef0N6KKswcLC91cPHyuIKy74wIRJT g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ByAQBg0ipY/4ENJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgnNBAQEBAQEfgUkPB403lwqPRoMNgg+CB4YjHIIWPxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRhAQEBBCMKTBIBCAQNAwECKAMCBDAUCQoEAQ0FiGeveoIpi1sBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEcixaEaIJkgl0FmkEBkGCQIo1HhAkBHjeBBByFHHKGMoEMAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,641,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="169114120"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Nov 2016 09:21:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAF9L66a017680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:21:06 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:21:06 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 04:21:06 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net>, Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>, "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02
Thread-Index: AQHSPyGX7iA0VGAHT0WXxK+WUhWaGQ==
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:21:05 +0000
Message-ID: <D4510265.88F0D%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.61.113]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D451026588F0Daceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/nqH4BLJ2Y2nh0eKaOzUL2bBuXJA>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 09:21:11 -0000
Hi Shraddha, I had sent you a comment on this version after IETF 96. Thanks, Acee From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Shraddha Hegde <shraddha@juniper.net<mailto:shraddha@juniper.net>> Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 3:49 AM To: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com<mailto:acee@lindem.com>>, "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com<mailto:akr@cisco.com>>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>> Subject: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02 Acee/Abhay, The draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload has been presented multiple times in OSPF WG and is stable since last IETF. Authors believe it is ready for WG last call and would like to request the draft be moved further. Rgds Shraddha
- [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02 Shraddha Hegde
- Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload-02 Acee Lindem (acee)