IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 58th IETF OSPF WG Agenda

"Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@MARCONI.COM> Wed, 05 November 2003 17:23 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA13637 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <23.00C379AB@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:12 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 59472352 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:11 -0500
Received: from 169.144.68.6 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:11 -0400
Received: from mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.12]) by mailgate.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04055 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com (uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com [169.144.2.221]) by mailman.pit.comms.marconi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22288 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by uspitsmsgrtr01.pit.comms.marconi.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <W2WGQZX1>; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:23:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <39469E08BD83D411A3D900204840EC55FB70DC@vie-msgusr-01.dc.fore.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 12:23:02 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: "Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@MARCONI.COM>
Subject: Re: 58th IETF OSPF WG Agenda
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

  I might not attend Minneapolis IETF. Here are some
  concerns.

-> >Advertising a Router's Local Addresses in     10 Mins
-> Rahul Aggrawal
-> >OSPF TE Extension
-> >draft-raggarwa-ospf-te-node-addr-00.txt

  The above draft reads:

     OSPFv2 stub links in the router LSA [OSPFv2],
     provide stub reachability information to the router but
     are not sufficient to learn all the local addresses of
     a router.

  Aren't we duplicating the information in Router LSA and
  TE LSA ? We can use passive interface capability to flood
  this desired information using Router LSA.

  In other words, why is Router LSA stub info not *sufficient*
  to learn all local addresses (if we enable active/passive
  OSPF routing over all those interfaces) ?

Venkata.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email