[OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01.txt
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 09 September 2014 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD731A031D for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGUA2zxtbumD for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56E21A0327 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 17:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1730; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1410222542; x=1411432142; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Z6+0n7mB8kxBfKL+bkBYSCm9A9QetOrdddKb6l7PbA0=; b=A6y5FVS0cSlRrpQl81spkn9K+y1k19GFIZ7uOgK6G3PJcosLcVqwl04N 8atpbC2YgmtUaAJygCgcMNj4AwpVkQGcwDBicgPn6QXVAxSOGOm9tUr6e W3kK2SlsdrteTqslFAm5F3eTjklQNQs9K4KE/MHKdBuYtMVZGcd1fSMy4 Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAHBIDlStJA2F/2dsb2JhbABZgw1TUwQEygGHSgGBFhZ4hAQBAQR3EgIBCEYyGwEGAwIEEwmIOQgFvQMBF49UhEwFinmGR4QwhwKBX5NNg2FsAYFHgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,489,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="350515827"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Sep 2014 00:29:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s890T2qQ024249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 00:29:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.175]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:29:01 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHPy5KeNrDn3NDNnU+tyKPe9koymZv4A7iA
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:29:01 +0000
Message-ID: <D033C1A0.2A32%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20140908182745.24078.54544.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140908182745.24078.54544.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <591A210CE9C05A44BCA17B9B57EBAA8B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/uA0DvdB_R5FdBZ8kVh3Gg4EsMDg
Subject: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:29:05 -0000
This version includes clarifications in response to Tony Przygienda¹s comments as well as some editorial changes. There are no changes to the protocol extensions. Thanks, Acee On 9/8/14, 2:27 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01.txt >has been successfully submitted by Acee Lindem and posted to the >IETF repository. > >Name: draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr >Revision: 01 >Title: OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute Advertisement >Document date: 2014-09-08 >Group: ospf >Pages: 14 >URL: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01.tx >t >Status: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr/ >Htmlized: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01 >Diff: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-prefix-link-attr-01 > >Abstract: > OSPFv2 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done > with the fixed-format Link State Advertisements (LSAs) as described > in RFC 2328. This document defines OSPF opaque LSAs based on Type- > Length-Value (TLV) tuples that can be used to associate additional > attributes with prefixes or links. Dependent on the application, > these prefixes and links may or not be advertised in the fixed-format > LSAs. The OSPF opaque LSAs are optional and fully backward > compatible. > > > > > >Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >submission >until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >The IETF Secretariat >