[OSPF] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt> (Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide) to Informational RFC

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Thu, 04 October 2012 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84BD11E80E0 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuNK9QSF+ceJ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E7811E809A for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q94JfV97015523 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:41:38 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.166]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:41:33 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:41:31 -0400
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt> (Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: Ac2iaEHB42MVBKaPSiqW/4aP+hEq0g==
Message-ID: <3AB02F87-A9D2-4285-9BF9-2FB3B5E0B996@ericsson.com>
References: <20121003174843.21226.13609.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-15--442178992"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [OSPF] Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt> (Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:41:38 -0000

FYI... 

Begin forwarded message:

> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> Date: October 3, 2012 1:48:43 PM EDT
> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: "karp@ietf.org" <karp@ietf.org>
> Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt> (Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide) to Informational RFC
> Reply-To: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
> 
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Keying and Authentication for
> Routing Protocols WG (karp) to consider the following document:
> - 'Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide'
>  <draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt> as Informational RFC
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2012-10-17. Exceptionally, comments may be
> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>   This document analyzes OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 according to the guidelines
>   set forth in section 4.2 of RFC6518.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis/
> 
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis/ballot/
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
>