IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication - <draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-04.txt>

Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com> Fri, 22 May 2009 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=386aea497=acee@redback.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165693A6CA9 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2009 08:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.466, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a51OhKVEHglJ for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2009 08:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgate.redback.com (mgate.redback.com [155.53.3.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712913A6AFB for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2009 08:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,234,1241420400"; d="scan'208";a="1868206"
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]) by mgate.redback.com with ESMTP; 22 May 2009 08:36:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3A6DE010F for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2009 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18922-08 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2009 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6???1] (svilogin-1.sj.us.am.ericsson.se [155.53.154.39]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4398CDE010E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2009 08:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To: <DABE244D-DBC3-43A9-8363-571942933EF3@redback.com>
References: <DABE244D-DBC3-43A9-8363-571942933EF3@redback.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <CCAEA953-9DAA-4FFA-BD8E-EC35A3BF38A7@redback.com>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:36:37 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF WG Last Call for OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication - <draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-04.txt>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:38:11 -0000

The WG last call has ended. We'll incorporate the John Smith's  
comment on the missing HMAC-SHA-224 block length and send the draft  
to the ADs for evaluation.
Thanks,
Acee
On May 7, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> The WG last call for the subject document will begin today and end  
> Friday, May 22nd at 12:00 AM PDT. Please review the document and  
> send your comments to this list. This version includes the Apad in  
> the HMAC calculation consistent with the discussions we had in  
> Philadelphia and SF.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee and Abhay_______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email