Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairness...

[Lars Eggert <[e-mail]>]

On 2008-6-9, at 1:33, ext Stas Khirman wrote:
> P.S. I have no idea if Y.flowreq had been reviewed by IETF and will
> appreciate any input on this topic.

It has; the transport area has exchanged a number of liaison  
statements with the ITU-T on this over the last few years. The latest  
one, FYI, is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/447/.

The executive summary is that Y.flowreq proposes to redefine a number  
of core Internet protocols in a way that isn't clearly understood at a  
technical level, and the interactions of those changes with the rest  
of the Internet protocol suite are even more unclear at this point.  
We've cautioned the ITU-T that a realization of Y.flowreq requires  
changes to protocols that aren't under their control, and that any  
such work will hence need to happen in the IETF.

Lars
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi