Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairness...
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Mon, 09 June 2008 09:28 UTC
Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E423A6BAB; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FFB3A6BAB for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.174, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yotUSo0BGsdD for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717023A690F for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m599Rn6M015923; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 04:28:24 -0500
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:27:44 +0300
Received: from dhcp180.dagstuhl.de ([10.241.184.208]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:27:42 +0300
Message-Id: <B5B2CA9E-0E17-4E48-9B69-BAED5706D840@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: ext Stas Khirman <stas@khirman.com>
In-Reply-To: <064e01c8c9c0$08f77cc0$710d11ac@jnpr.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:25:21 +0200
References: <06BEE447-3D17-45D0-A73B-E248C3141F51@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU><484C1958.2010900@isi.edu> <8719C03C-9EC9-482B-9536-1784F95DC8A8@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <064e01c8c9c0$08f77cc0$710d11ac@jnpr.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2008 09:27:44.0013 (UTC) FILETIME=[124AA3D0:01C8CA13]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org, 'Nicholas Weaver' <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>, 'Joe Touch' <touch@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairness...
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
On 2008-6-9, at 1:33, ext Stas Khirman wrote: > P.S. I have no idea if Y.flowreq had been reviewed by IETF and will > appreciate any input on this topic. It has; the transport area has exchanged a number of liaison statements with the ITU-T on this over the last few years. The latest one, FYI, is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/447/. The executive summary is that Y.flowreq proposes to redefine a number of core Internet protocols in a way that isn't clearly understood at a technical level, and the interactions of those changes with the rest of the Internet protocol suite are even more unclear at this point. We've cautioned the ITU-T that a realization of Y.flowreq requires changes to protocols that aren't under their control, and that any such work will hence need to happen in the IETF. Lars _______________________________________________ p2pi mailing list p2pi@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
- [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairness... Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Joe Touch
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Stas Khirman
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Joe Touch
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Lars Eggert
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Joe Touch
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Joe Touch
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Joe Touch
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Joe Touch
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Stas Khirman
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Richard Bennett
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Richard Bennett
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Daniel Weitzner
- Re: [p2pi] One more proposed definition of fairne… Richard Bennett