IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [p2prg] RGLC review for draft-kamei-p2p-experiments-japan-06

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Mon, 16 July 2012 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5935121F8797 for <p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.443
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.156, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQRrRBCKWQvB for <p2prg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220B721F8795 for <p2prg@irtf.org>; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,593,1336374000"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="666067329"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2012 04:02:16 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.76.239]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q6GB2FoW018652; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.13]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:02:07 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: stefano previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [p2prg] RGLC review for draft-kamei-p2p-experiments-japan-06
Thread-Index: AQHNYz+6om1XmOOS1EaMz6L5/MTwWpcsM7eA
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:02:05 +0000
Message-ID: <DC1C10C0-630A-40F6-B262-55E9FDFFDB44@netapp.com>
References: <4FDFA4A7.3090807@bell-labs.com> <6781AC7A-D3B1-466F-9B3F-4AF876A027A0@cisco.com> <4FFDA79D.7030200@bell-labs.com> <B55FD6BD-B79C-46CB-BEA6-5B3DA3F392BC@cisco.com>, <500023AC.1080008@bell-labs.com> <D3F4DC8E-77B5-4776-8900-50CEB7348592@cisco.com> <50007966.9060603@alcatel-lucent.com> <287BB0A4-D5C1-4522-BE4B-ED71CFB25334@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <287BB0A4-D5C1-4522-BE4B-ED71CFB25334@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.51]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_654A06FF-ECAF-49A0-8BC0-C8CE029A3E42"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Volker Hilt <volkerh@alcatel-lucent.com>, "p2prg@irtf.org" <p2prg@irtf.org>, takeshi INOUE <inoue@jp.ntt.net>, KAMEI Satoshi / 亀井聡 <skame@nttv6.jp>
Subject: Re: [p2prg] RGLC review for draft-kamei-p2p-experiments-japan-06
X-BeenThere: p2prg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer Research Group <p2prg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/p2prg>, <mailto:p2prg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/p2prg>
List-Post: <mailto:p2prg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2prg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2prg>, <mailto:p2prg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:01:34 -0000

The submission deadline is for all IDs. (The RFC streams are different, but the IDs are not.)

Lars

On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:42, stefano previdi wrote:

> 
> On Jul 13, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Volker Hilt wrote:
> 
>> Tsuyoshi Momose,
>> 
>> great, thanks! Please note that the deadline for draft submissions is
>> 2012-07-16 (Monday) cut-off by UTC 24:00
> 
> 
> note that IRTF needs not to follow ietf deadline and we may be more flexible.
> 
> s.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Volker
>> 
>> 
>> On 13.07.2012 11:07, Tsuyoshi Momose (tmomose) wrote:
>>> I'll update the I-D as you proposed.
>>> 
>>> Thank you.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Tsuyoshi Momose
>>> 
>>> On 2012/07/13, at 22:27, "Vijay K. Gurbani"<vkg@bell-labs.com>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 07/13/2012 05:16 AM, Tsuyoshi Momose (tmomose) wrote:
>>>> vkg>  I remain unsure on how a non-dummy peer sends information to a "hint
>>>> vkg>  server".
>>>>> I may not understand your question correctly, but let me summarize
>>>>> again the purpose and behavior of dummy nodes. The experiment coordinator
>>>>> put a hint server which behaves like an ALTO server.
>>>>> Every P2P nodes provided by vendors who join this experiment always use
>>>>> the hint server.
>>>> 
>>>> Aha ... that bit --- "every P2P node provided by vendors who join this
>>>> experiment always use the hint server." --- is what is missing
>>>> in the draft.
>>>> 
>>>> A quick sentence like:
>>>> 
>>>> "Every P2P node provided by participating vendors in the
>>>>  experiment was configured so it always contacted the hint server."
>>>> 
>>>> is all that is needed.
>>>> 
>>>> That's it.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> - vijay
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>>>> 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>>>> Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
>>>> Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> p2prg mailing list
> p2prg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2prg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email