[P2PSIP] Conclusion of consensus call on adopting I-D draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04 as WG document
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 12 July 2012 19:03 UTC
Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9199D21F858F for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.942
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.942 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.357, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c85Xoj9TKuss for <p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E456621F857F for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cjbc@smtp01.uc3m.es) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08FA5C3DC19 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:03:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1342119821.21694.80.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: p2psip@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:03:41 +0200
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.3-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1350-6.5.0.1024-19034.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--7.874-7.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--7.874-7.0-31-10
Subject: [P2PSIP] Conclusion of consensus call on adopting I-D draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04 as WG document
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:03:09 -0000
Hi, Following up on the consensus call: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2psip/current/msg06232.html There is not enough interest and consensus (In favor: +2, Against: +1) within the P2PSIP WG to adopt I-D draft-peng-p2psip-snmp-04 as a working group document in its current shape. We suggest the authors to consider the feedback received, revise the draft, and get at least a couple of additional reviews before considering it again for WG adoption. Chairs
- [P2PSIP] Conclusion of consensus call on adopting… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano