[P2PSIP] DRAFT agenda for the meeting in Prague
"David A. Bryan" <dbryan@sipeerior.com> Wed, 07 March 2007 17:23 UTC
Return-path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOzrD-0005ZS-SQ; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:23:19 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOzrA-0005WQ-Ax for p2psip@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:23:16 -0500
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOznC-0004RK-Tw for p2psip@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:19:16 -0500
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l36so285262nfa for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:19:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=jAe9WIiWjb+cQJALIbte7azW4GuXmCpmb86IR9Bz6GcdND8F8iuPbrJrevMeqWHBwCDQ3ji848BEjPslscLUBZSVs5RIgrHbzAVn727b2Qy9W8jceWYx0Jx2Q+0Bx1Sqc72Yv2QzjnOc+ZZjZIZC2ErXDGWXS1DlatzpVRQnEOc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=HrZs2wcNixvecFqqXawgnNoa1QFILeDWEywGPZumWczxmYfD5gDrdvNTXDZ8x4vC0CGfzopBs/KrQ1TgId9ydd5lS3QC76LqfRybppuV+GFU/jcXauz+EJkQvCOMYV4KbNaFCRQ/T8KbxEzVp9tQkOg1pzrSB6aSGzMg/LE+Nns=
Received: by 10.82.136.4 with SMTP id j4mr9660935bud.1173287947090; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.82.127.17 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4d4304a00703070919j13188535pf6d6d9c21b7177c6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:19:07 -0500
From: "David A. Bryan" <dbryan@sipeerior.com>
To: P2PSIP Mailing List <p2psip@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9d097658210428c3
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf3becbbd6d1a45acbe2ffd4ab88bdc2
Cc:
Subject: [P2PSIP] DRAFT agenda for the meeting in Prague
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org
Hi all: We have posted a DRAFT agenda for the meeting at: http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07mar/agenda/p2psip.txt I also pasted it at the end of this email. Notice that the approach we took was instead of just people presenting each draft, we have grouped it by open question, with the related (current, not-expired, and in before the cut off dates) drafts to be read for each one listed. We've also listed 2 or 3 presenters for each. What we would like to see is those people work together to come up with a presentation that reflects the question and views of each presenter. (even if it presents two or three different views!) We are keeping the presentations very short, presenting the open questions and outline of the proposed solutions only, to allow for a good bit of discussion, so you will HAVE TO COME IN HAVING READ THE DRAFTS or it may be hard to follow the discussion. While I don't think we are going to be able to come to conclusions on these issues, this should get things going so we *can* start making these decisions in Chicago and move forward, in particular, we want to come out of the meeting with enough of an idea on these questions that we can have people submit a few fully fleshed out (with all the things we think we need detailed and defined) concrete, *implementable* proposals ready before Chicago so we can better answer these questions and move forward on our WG items. I'd like to ask the presenters to get slides to us as early as possible...certainly before IETF starts! We'll send out a zip file of the relevant drafts shortly. Thanks! --- 9:00-9:10 Agenda bash presenter: chairs 9:10-9:20 what charter is, what we are doing here, how we are going to move forward presenter: chairs 9:20-9:40 Overview Document work: What are the major open questions in this draft? presenters: Philip Matthews and Dean Willis relevant drafts: draft-willis-p2psip-concepts-04 :10 minutes for presentation, remainder discussion 9:40-10:00 Open Question: Selecting a DHT Charter states we will support multiple DHTs. We need to select one (or a very, very few) "base", must implement DHTs. Leading candidates today *appear* to be Chord and Bamboo, and possibly Kademlia. Discussion of Protocol Implementations of pluggable DHTs and the tradeoffs between Chord, Bamboo, and Kademlia presenters: Henning Schulzrinne and David Bryan relevant drafts: draft-baset-sipping-p2pcommon-01, draft-zangrilli-p2psip-dsip-dhtchord-00, draft-zangrilli-p2psip-dsip-dhtbamboo-00 :05 minutes for presentation, remainder discussion 10:00-10:30 Open Question: How do NATs affect the requirements of a protocol? Discussion of lessons learned from proposals for NAT traversal and how they translate into requirements for the protocol presenters: Bruce Lowekamp and Philip Matthews relevant drafts: draft-matthews-p2psip-nats-and-overlays-01, draft-matthews-p2psip-dsip-nat-traversal-00 :10 minutes for presentation, remainder discussion 10:30-11:00 Open Question: What are the requirements for the peer protocol? We know we need this protocol. What are the things that a protocol proposal must do to be considered? What have we learned from the proposals made to date? We want rough consensus on what this needs to do, so we can have firm (real) proposals to consider at Chicago. What sort of routing? Other properties? presenters: Henning Schulzrinne, Bruce Lowekamp, Jiang XingFeng relevant drafts: draft-bryan-p2psip-dsip-00, draft-willis-p2psip-concepts-04, draft-jiang-p2psip-peer-protocol-requirement-00 :10 minutes for presentation, remainder discussion 11:00-11:30 Open Question: What would a client protocol need to do and do we need it? Discussion of client protocol: Do we need a new client protocol that is separate from the peer protocol and isn't SIP? If so, what would it need to do? presenters: Henning Schulzrinne, Dean Willis, Spencer Dawkins relevant drafts: draft-willis-p2psip-concepts-04 :10 minutes for presentation, remainder discussion -- David A. Bryan dbryan@SIPeerior.com +1.757.565.0101 x101 +1.757.565.0088 (fax) www.SIPeerior.com _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list P2PSIP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
- [P2PSIP] DRAFT agenda for the meeting in Prague David A. Bryan