Re: [P2PSIP] draft-maenpaa-p2psip-self-tuning-01

[Enrico Marocco <[e-mail]>]

Cullen Jennings wrote:
> I like this draft and would love to seem some experimental data from  
> operational networks playing with it.
> 
> I'm not sure what anyone else things, but I think it would be worth  
> considering moving just one small part of to the base draft - namely  
> Section 5.6.1.
> 
> On the Pro side for doing this:  It's really easy to implement and it  
> would provide some interesting options for future things such as this  
> self tuning draft.
> 
> On the Con side for doing this: in many DHT, a large percentage of  
> nodes leave without sending nay signaling that they are going to Leave  
> so specifying what goes in a Leave message might be a little optimistic

Considering also detected failures other than bye messages seems a
pretty straightforward next step. I don't have an opinion whether this
should be in the base specs or defined as an extension, but totally
agree that a self-configuration mechanism is definitely worth having in
any real DHT deployment.

-- 
Ciao,
Enrico